Re: [council] RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

[Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

1. New version looks good to me, I agree with sending the letter.
2. I have refrained from expressing my views on what I perceive to be rather 
serious privacy implications of this transfer policy. However, if I am correct 
in my understanding of the Privacy risks described, this is a serious 
abrogation of privacy rights. Proxy services have been recognized as a partial, 
reasonably priced solution to the whois disclosure problem, in the absence of 
enforcement of privacy law. However, revealing the registrant's identity during 
the transfer displays a rather cynical disregard or the registrant's privacy 
rights and expectations, which undermines confidence in‎ ICANN's policy and 
procedures for proxy services.  It would be a pity if this were to happen.
Stephanie Perrin
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Bell network.
From: Darcy Southwell
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:49 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Susan Kawaguchi; Phil Corwin; Anthony Harris
Subject: Re: [council] RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to 
ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy


All,

I appreciate the support for James’ suggestion.

Based on concerns expressed by some, I’ve revised the last two paragraphs of 
the letter slightly (they are redlined so you can easily see the changes) and 
offer this friendly amendment (so to speak) to the draft letter that goes with 
this motion.  For those of you who already expressed support for James’ 
suggestion and the prior draft, is this new draft still agreeable to you?  I 
believe this new draft captures the same spirit, but opens up the possibility 
of solutions to what could end up being something more appropriate than the 
PPSAI IRT.

Please let me know if you have questions.  I’m happy to answer.

Best,
Darcy

From: Anthony Harris <anthonyrharris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 5:10 PM
To: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Susan Kawaguchi <susank@xxxxxx>, Darcy Southwell 
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to 
ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

I also agree with the letter being sent to the Board

Tony

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Phil Corwin 
<psc@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Concurring with my BC colleague.

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On 
Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 6:11 PM
To: Darcy Southwell; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN 
Board Regarding Transfer Policy

Hello,

I agree with the letter being sent to the Board instead of a formal motion.



Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook, Inc.
Legal Dept.

1601 Willow Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025


From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Darcy Southwell 
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 3:41 PM
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy

All,

Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication.  You will recall 
from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council 
would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further 
direction to ICANN staff.  This motion and the draft communication were 
prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our 
December 1 meeting.

Best,
Darcy
__________
Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer
M: +1 503-453-7305 ? Skype: darcy.enyeart
[tps://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/tjCmzaF_7ZGN1PtB2KAV5OVQn-Q_Xvh_p3zhRf5gB5-ISEZOkC_6lvGj1xU-T1CFq]
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2016.0.7859 / Virus Database: 4664/13314 - Release Date: 10/30/16
Internal Virus Database is out of date.