ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: ICANN Travel Support for 1 additional GNSO attendee to LA Meeting of CCWG - 25 & 26 September

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: ICANN Travel Support for 1 additional GNSO attendee to LA Meeting of CCWG - 25 & 26 September
  • From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:12:18 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <028501d0f07e$0352fbe0$09f8f3a0$@afilias.info>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Organization: Afilias
  • References: <028501d0f07e$0352fbe0$09f8f3a0$@afilias.info>
  • Reply-to: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQF2jq4nU3GXZxbaOnt6Wv65bKWjLp73KkVQ

All,

 

Following our various discussions on this topic, I propose to put forward
the name of Greg Shatan to ICANN as the additional GNSO sponsored traveller
to the meeting.

Unless there is a substantial objection to this in the next 24 hours, Greg's
name will be passed onto ICANN.

 

I am sorry that we have had to only select one candidate by this crude
method and at short notice but that is the way it has worked out.

 

Thank-you, especially to those who were prepared to travel, and also to
those who provided input.

 

Jonathan

 

 

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 16 September 2015 13:49
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: ICANN Travel Support for 1 additional GNSO attendee to LA Meeting
of CCWG - 25 & 26 September

 

All,

 

ICANN has offered to support one traveller per chartering organisation in
addition to the currently sponsored travel slots (primarily for members of
the CCWG).

 

We do not have a simple process or mechanism to deal with this, especially
in such a tight time frame.

 

Currently, Carlos (a GNSO Council member and participant in the CCWG) has
volunteered to attend and take up this option. 

Accordingly, please be aware of this offer and communicate any objections or
concerns you may have.

 

Also, if you are aware of an active CCWG participant from within your SG who
could make effective (for the benefit of the GNSO) use of such funding,
please check their availability and make the name known.

 

If more than one candidate emerges, we may need to undertake some form of
vote.

 

Thanks

 

 

Jonathan

 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>