ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] FW: NomCom appointee skill sets

  • To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [council] FW: NomCom appointee skill sets
  • From: "Edward Morris" <emorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 03:01:59 -0400
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=milk.toast.net; s=MDaemon; t=1414825323; x=1415430123; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References; bh=JJl2TXA7FOUUmhyvrkqIJ8A3tv fYzVmjQWGHjOn4fAQ=; b=lVaPrKIffdx3QdJhQAImKjpyaBT6SpRrYehXJNBhT3 +NykZSGChlizI0xtZXia0ujeQyQ8bfbfJ6MvI4UHaBwr3/NYTzNXcyzXerzHhFdH ITNqcvEGIpVa4DMFG0Z5msGRjgIz99k/2Fjz/DoKvtIVaBacCFuWTu1w+SeO+uDc w=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=milk.toast.net; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=BiOgtrJoz/hrJI4mcwDSShWDh4tjOolU9uerkDk0Rx7yG4qzup6YfO9tzCIK 0DiIGSqkIcoYyDMzcIgBY9tZ9RFkUibeavJdwkMlXKPdD+OiPQ6o/kbeC LCOpnX1rpTSQtml0eHwG0vzXbXQw2otfjqRiCh7z5RBb0EU9JlgwUc=;
  • In-reply-to: <D079180C.5A25F%skawaguchi@fb.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <df235bec4e8e46b89f5b704eeb151453@CHI-US-MAIL-2A.us.kmz.com> <5452B13C.2040004@acm.org> <54535687.3030105@key-systems.net> <D079180C.5A25F%skawaguchi@fb.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Susan.


- At the end of the day consumer protection, insuring that the domain name 
system is safe and secure, should be one of our highest priorities.


I agree with you that consumer protection is a justifiable and proper 
rationale for the creation and extension of intellectual monopoly rights and 
has been deemed so in Anglo-American jurisprudence, at least, since the 
Bakers Marking Law of 1266. We may on occasion disagree with the structure 
and scope of such rights but I'm delighted there seems to be some practical 
agreement on the purpose of the rights themselves.


-We could restructure the list 

International law which includes the following: 
     Data protection
     Privacy
     Consumer rights
     Human rights
     Competition law
     Intellectual property law


I think this is a fine and practical proposal that I support.

Thanks so much for your contribution.

Regards,

Ed
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>