ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Summary of GAC Communique advice on IGO & Red Cross protections; mentions of GNSO work on Whois


David --

I get the frustration -- if you'll permit me my POV, we should consider the 
possibility the GAC may be holding off on specific advice in favor of PDP 
development, which is still in its early stage.  The GAC also isn't (at least 
yet) functionally prepared to contribute as specifically as we might like.  
Hopefully this is an acknowledgement that the current PDP is going in the right 
direction.

For now, let's take the GAC's advice as it is.  I intend to use the liaison 
role to update the GAC on PDP progress -- they may very well have something 
more specific to continue outside of formal advice as we go forward.

Mason

On Oct 16, 2014, at 1:19 PM, David Cake wrote:

> 
> On 16 Oct 2014, at 11:05 am, Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On IGOs and curative rights:
>> The GAC expressly acknowledges that there is an ongoing GNSO PDP on this, 
>> and advises that in their view the solution should not be in the form of 
>> amending the UDRP and URS. They also state that they welcome continued 
>> dialogue with the NGPC and the GNSO to develop concrete solutions. My 
>> understanding is that the GAC considers this piece of advice to be part of 
>> their effort at early engagement – by providing government’s views to us at 
>> an early stage of our PDP for one thing.
>       
>       Without rationale or explicitly suggesting an alternative, this advice 
> is pretty much useless. 
> 
> Bret said:
>> My personal opinion is that we also are free to ignore the GAC advice 
>> entirely, as the advice is directed to the Board. We can and should offer 
>> GNSO policy advice on whatever track we believe is best, and then the Board 
>> can decide what to do with it
> 
> 
> I am in full agreement. We can offer the GAC useful ways to contribute, but 
> we can't make them use them. 
> If some members of the GAC want to communicate only via one sentence lines in 
> the GAC communique, that is like trying to have a conversation with someone 
> who will communicate only by putting up billboards. 
> 
>       David

Mason Cole 
VP Communications & Industry Relations
Donuts Inc.
…………………………………………
mason@xxxxxxxxx
Ofc +1 503 908 7623
Cell +1 503 407 2555






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>