Re: [council] Flow chart - gTLD Registration Services PDP
Hi Avri, As part of the PDP Improvements (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/pdp-improvements-table-16jan14-en.pdf), the Council agreed to 'Include draft Charter as standard element in Preliminary and Final Issue Report' and evaluate after 6-12 months the impact / experience of doing so following which it could be decided whether the PDP Manual should be modified accordingly to add this as an alternative to forming a DT (which is a 'should' but not a 'must' at the moment). Best regards, Marika On 02/10/14 15:41, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >Hi, > >The correction of my recall convinced me to go back are re-read the >manual: > >I noticed: > >> Upon initiation of the PDP, a group formed at the direction of >> Council should be convened to draft the charter for the PDP Team. > > >Does this present problems in relation to including a charter in evan a >final Issues report at this time? > >Incidentally the impact analysis questions that concern me and that I >believe need comment before the issuance of a final issue report relate >to: > >> The following elements should be considered in the Issue Report: >> a) The proposed issue raised for consideration > >This issue includes the rights impacts that need to be an explicit part >of the PDP. > >This is such a large and critical change moving forward, we need to make >sure that the PDP starts on a solid basis. Lets not make the same >mistakes that have been elsewhere of trying to start a large and >critical process without adequate public comment. > >Thanks > >avri Attachment:
smime.p7s
|