Re: [council] questions re IGO/INGO motion

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas & Team:

Sorry for the late response, but didn't want to "blind side" Chris with my 
questions during tomorrow's meeting.

I have only two questions
(1)  This PDP affects incumbent gTLDs (including new gTLDs), why is it being 
handled by the NGPC and not the full board?  I have not received an answer to 
this process change.
(2)  In light of the GAC's statements in the London Communique, has the NGPC or 
Board changed its position on the likelihood that this approach will be 
successful?  Or is this effort at a compromise "DOA"?

J.

From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, August 21, 2014 at 12:24
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] questions re IGO/INGO motion

All,
we had discussed during the last Council call that it would be helpful to 
provide the NGPC / Chris Disspain with questions Councillors might have. Would 
you be as kind as to send your questions to the list in preparation of the 
upcoming call?

Thanks and kind regards,
Thomas


___________________________________________________________
Thomas Rickert, Attorney at Law

Managing Partner, Schollmeyer & Rickert Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
www.anwaelte.de<http://www.anwaelte.de>

Director Names & Numbers, eco Association of the German Internet Industry
www.eco.de