ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] From the Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee on 30 July 2014: Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] From the Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee on 30 July 2014: Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework
  • From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 22:51:39 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-AU, en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac+upAXQTWH7ejNwSVWlRetDLU0WMQ==
  • Thread-topic: From the Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee on 30 July 2014: Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

From:  
https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2014-07-30-en#1.a

Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework

Whereas, on 7 October 2013 the NGPC directed the President, Global Domains 
Division to implement the proposal to manage the occurrence of collisions 
between new gTLDs and existing private uses of the same strings as presented in 
the "New gTLD Collision Occurrence Management Plan" (the "Collision Occurrence 
Management Plan"), and in doing so to take into account further advice that may 
be offered by Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) and other 
experts and stakeholders.

Whereas, the Collision Occurrence Management Plan called for a follow-up study 
that would inform the development of a Name Collision Occurrence Management 
Framework.

Whereas, on 26 February 2014, ICANN published the follow-up study called for in 
the NGPC's 7 October 2013 resolution, which was prepared by JAS Global Advisors 
(JAS) and entitled "Mitigating the Risk of DNS Namespace Collisions: A Study on 
Namespace Collisions in the Global Internet DNS Namespace and a Framework for 
Risk Mitigation, Phase One Report" 
[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-mitigation-26feb14-en.pdf
 ] (the "JAS Study and Name Collision Framework"). The JAS Study and Name 
Collision Framework, which was posted for public comment, provided a set of 
recommendations that describe a comprehensive framework to reduce current and 
future DNS namespace collisions, alert operators of potential DNS namespace 
related issues, and provide emergency response capabilities in the event that 
critical (e.g., life safety) systems are adversely impacted. The JAS Study and 
Name Collision Framework was revised 
[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-mitigation-study-06jun14-en.pdf
 ] in response to public comments.

Whereas, on 6 June 2014, the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee 
(SSAC) published SAC 066 
[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-066-en.pdf ]: SSAC Comment 
Concerning JAS Phase One Report on Mitigating the Risk of DNS Namespace 
Collisions, in which it offered advice and recommendations to the Board on the 
framework presented in the JAS Study and Name Collision Framework.

Whereas, the proposed name collision framework being presented to the NGPC for 
consideration takes into account advice offered by SSAC in SAC066, and the 
advice of other experts and stakeholders, including the recommendations from 
JAS, public comments, and community discussions at ICANN meetings.

Whereas, the NGPC acknowledges comments from the community concerning the need 
to ensure that all names, which registries blocked under their Alternate Path 
to Delegation Report, be subject to the rights protection mechanisms 
established by the New gTLD Program.

Whereas, the ICANN Board previously adopted the NGPC's recommendation to direct 
the ICANN President and CEO to develop a long-term plan to management name 
collision at the root.

Whereas, the NGPC is undertaking this action pursuant to the authority granted 
to it by the Board on 10 April 2012, to exercise the ICANN Board's authority 
for any and all issues that may arise relating to the New gTLD Program.

Resolved (2014.07.30.NG01), the NGPC adopts the Name Collision Occurrence 
Management Framework 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-framework-30jul14-en.pdf>
 [see attached] to continue to manage the occurrence of collisions between new 
gTLDs and existing private uses of the same strings, and directs the President 
and CEO, or his designee(s), to take the necessary actions to implement the 
Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework. As part of implementation, 
registry operators will be provided with a Name Collision Occurrence Assessment 
(see Registry Agreement, Specification 6, Section 6), which will address, among 
other things, procedures to remove second level domains from the block list 
including measures to protect rights holders.

Resolved (2014.07.30.NG02), the NGPC directs the President and CEO, or his 
designee(s), to consult with the community during the next 90 days from the 
publication of these resolutions to address appropriate rights protection 
mechanisms for names included in a registry operator's Alternate Path to 
Delegation Report and recorded in the Trademark Clearinghouse that registry 
operator withheld from allocation during its Sunrise period or Claims period.

Resolved (2014.07.30.NG03), the NGPC directs the President and CEO, or his 
designee(s) to provide information to, and work with the GNSO to consider 
whether policy work on developing a long-term plan to manage gTLD name 
collision issues should be undertaken.

Resolved (2014.07.30.NG04), the NGPC directs the President and CEO, or his 
designee(s), to continue to provide briefings and share information and best 
practices with ccTLD managers concerning name collision issues in light of the 
Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework.

Attachment: name-collision-framework-30jul14-en.pdf
Description: name-collision-framework-30jul14-en.pdf



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>