ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] [Soac-infoalert] ICANN 50 possible Thursday change

  • To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] [Soac-infoalert] ICANN 50 possible Thursday change
  • From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 17:38:05 +0200
  • Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <44AC2AE3-20F8-45FB-BADA-169DCAA7A0E2@icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <C94067D5-E6FF-4E33-8626-EED2B5C015D9@shinkuro.com> <44AC2AE3-20F8-45FB-BADA-169DCAA7A0E2@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I think this is an excellent suggestion!

Thomas


Am 25.04.2014 um 23:33 schrieb Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>:

> 
> 
> Envoyé de mon iPhone
> 
> Début du message transféré :
> 
>> Expéditeur: "steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: 25 avril 2014 22:42:44 UTC+2
>> Destinataire: "SOAC-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Objet: [Soac-infoalert] ICANN 50 possible Thursday change
>> 
>> SO and AC chairs,
>> 
>> As you know, ICANN50 is fast approaching and post NETmundial we are now 
>> turning our thoughts to the tricky subject of how to ensure that we carve 
>> out enough quality time in the agenda to handle effective and comprehensive 
>> public dialogues on the Transition of the NTIA Stewardship of the  IANA 
>> function as well as the new ICANN Accountability track.  These will both 
>> require a chunk of non-conflicted time in London and the ability to offer 
>> high quality remote access to maximise participants from around the world.  
>> 
>> To the latter, we're exploring the possibility of setting up a series of 
>> remote hubs as some of you will have seen used at NETmundial to great 
>> acclaim. We will explore this idea further over the next week or so and keep 
>> you updated.
>> 
>> On the scheduling point, we'd like to suggest that for this meeting only we 
>> reshuffle the planned Thursday agenda.  Currently our thinking is that we 
>> start the morning at 8.30 to allow those groups having wrap up sessions to 
>> handle those requirements between 8.30 and 10am.  We follow this with a two 
>> hour session on ICANN Accountability followed by an early lunch break and 
>> then run a session on the Transition of the NTIA Stewardship of the  IANA 
>> function from 1-3 or 3.30.  This is the most effective time slot to maximise 
>> international participation. We'd run a shorter Public Forum from 4 - 6 and 
>> wrap up with a public Board meeting finishing at 7 and then Cocktails.
>> 
>> The RSSAC would like an open session during the meeting and we'd propose to 
>> put that into a Monday afternoon slot.  We anticipate that two hours will 
>> probably be adequate for the Public Forum because the Transition of the NTIA 
>> Stewardship of the  IANA function and ICANN Accountability topics will be 
>> very important for the community and would likely take up a chunk of the 
>> public forum under normal cirumstances.  
>> 
>> If you are in agreement with this suggestion we'd like to communicate it 
>> this week to enable people to firm up their travel plans. 
>> 
>> Please let us know your thoughts in the next day or two.
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Steve.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> soac-infoalert mailing list
>> soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>