Re: [council] Draft Motion for Approval of Revised GNSO Operating Procedures

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

i’ll second it.  i was on the SCI for most of these conversations.

mikey


On Mar 14, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> It does need a second.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 14-Mar-14 09:55, Maria Farrell wrote:
>> Thanks, Avri.
>> 
>> Do you need a second for this motion?
>> 
>> Maria
>> 
>> 
>> On 14 March 2014 13:06, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx <mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Attached is a motion and a red line Revision of the GNSO Operating
>>    principles addressing the following issues:
>> 
>>     > a.    the current GNSO Operating
>>     > Procedures do not contain a specific provision on the possibility of
>>     > resubmitting a motion for voting by the GNSO Council; and
>> 
>>        b.      the current GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which form
>>        Annex I of
>>        the GNSO Operating Procedures, do not contain a mechanism for
>>        Working
>>        Groups (WGs) to self-assess their work.
>> 
>> 
>>    These issues were referred to the SCI by the GNSO Council.
>> 
>>    These recommendations are made by the SCI after discussions that led
>>    to full consensus in the Committee.
>> 
>>    Thanks
>> 
>>    Avri Doria
>>    Acting as GNSO Council liaison to SCI
>> 
>> 
>> 


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP 
(ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)