Re: [council] Draft Singapore schedule
hi all (again). egad. a double apology. here are a couple ideas - expand the time again, maybe just little more - set the expectations for how that time is to be used. my fear is that we’ll get a long slide deck that will fill up the time and give us little opportunity to interact as a group. m On Feb 26, 2014, at 4:28 AM, David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And it is due to the report that we have given the JIG 30 minutes rather than > the 15 that most WGs have for been allotted. > Is that time sufficient, or should we expand it? > > Regards > > David > On 26 Feb 2014, at 1:55 am, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Thomas, as the JIG has been requested to provide the GNSO Council with >> suggestions on how to deal with IDN Variants and universal acceptance and >> deliver these suggestions to the GNSO Council by the ICANN Singapore >> meeting, it was envisioned that this conversation could happen in that >> slot (Saturday from 11.30 - 12.00) but maybe that could be made more >> explicit? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Marika >> >> On 25/02/14 18:35, "Thomas Rickert" <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for your work on this, David! >>> >>> I would very much like to discuss the issue of universal acceptance. One >>> might say that this is an issue for others to resolve, but ICANN will >>> likely be seen as a responsible party for not having taken sufficient >>> steps to ensure new gTLDs "work". Since the original policy >>> recommendations have been made by the GNSO, it appears to be appropriate >>> for the Council to follow-up on this. >>> >>> Thomas >>> >>> >>> Am 25.02.2014 um 16:35 schrieb David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>>> Please find attached a draft schedule for GNSO activities for the >>>> Singapore meeting. >>>> Please understand that, though interactions with senior ICANN staff >>>> and the board have to contend with very busy schedules, and so may be >>>> awkward to change, this is very much a draft schedule, presented for >>>> Council discussion and input - please feel free to suggest additional >>>> items, or remove them. You'll notice that 15 minutes per WG fills up a >>>> fair bit of our schedule, and we have allocated 30 minutes for some - >>>> comments on this appreciated. >>>> I very much appreciate your input either on list, or on the Council >>>> call. >>>> >>>> One item I'll note isn't currently on the schedule - the RSSAC is >>>> meeting at the Singapore meeting, and this is very unusual. We currently >>>> don't have any RSSAC/GNSO interaction scheduled - if council members >>>> think this would be valuable, please say so ASAP. Such interaction would >>>> have to be from Monday to Wednesday. >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <Singapore PUBLIC Draft Agenda v3 (2).xlsx> >>> >> >> <default.xml> > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) Attachment:
smime.p7s
|