Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agree.

In fact, ignoring something like this might be a clear indication that the 
Community has a problem with the ICANN Board.

J.



From: "john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday, February 21, 2014 at 10:21
To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>, GNSO Council List 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the 
ICANN CEO

Avri,

Note my earlier email.  It may be that no one will hear, but that does not mean 
we should not ask.

Berard

--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the 
ICANN CEO
From: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>
Date: 2/21/14 3:31 am
To: "Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>


Hi,

Interesting idea, but what makes you think anyone on the Board would
care what the crowd had to say. They barely care about what the duly
constituted SOs, ACs or Review Teams have to say beyond what the by-laws
force them to care about.

Now, if we can get National government ministers to crowd source the
review, maybe there is a chance they will pay attention.

avri

On 20-Feb-14 22:11, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> James,
> Yes, we should include all, but the ball has to start rolling
> somewhere. I figure we can do that.
> Berard
>
> --------- Original Message ---------
> Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review
> of the ICANN CEO
> From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: 2/20/14 1:01 pm
> To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>>, "John Berard"
> <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Cc: "Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
> Also think this is worth of discussion, but should include other
> SO/ACs in an effort to provide a "360" review.
> J.
> From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> ><mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 13:35
> To: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review
> of the ICANN CEO
> hi John,
> i sense a certain irony in your reference to crowdsourcing, but i
> went ahead and circulated your proposal amongst the ISPCP - initial
> reactions are positive. i personally think it's a great idea.
> mikey
>
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:28 AM, 
> john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> All,
> I think the next meeting of the ICANN, scheduled for London,
> marks two years of Fadi Chehade's term as the organization's
> President and CEO. In light of the interest driven by the
> Strategy Panels in what is called crowd sourcing, I wonder if we
> should consider instigating a performance review of the
> executive using that method.
> We can announce the initiative in Singapore and prepare a report
> for the London meeting. The standing for the Council is the
> growing executive influence over policy, looking no further than
> the rise of appointed strategy panels in lieu of community-based
> working groups.
> What is your view?
> Cheers,
> Berard
>
>
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com
> <http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter,
> Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>