ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Questions for the ICANN Board

  • To: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Questions for the ICANN Board
  • From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 09:27:32 -0300
  • Cc: "'WUKnoben'" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <002301cee38f$f70288d0$e5079a70$@afilias.info>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <013101cee307$debe1b00$9c3a5100$@afilias.info> <95059B848A514D18A91F55C09BEC49CF@WUKPC> <002301cee38f$f70288d0$e5079a70$@afilias.info>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You will not be surprised that I would be more than happy to report about the 
progress made with respect to IGO-IGO identigyers. This could also be an 
opportunity to remind the Board that they can (hopefully) expect something to 
come from the GNSO Council very soon. 

Thoma


Am 17.11.2013 um 09:24 schrieb "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Any others?
>  
> Anything specific to highlight about GNSO work as part of a positive message?
>  
> From: WUKnoben [mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 16 November 2013 18:15
> To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [council] Questions for the ICANN Board
>  
> How was the coordination done between the CEO and the Board re the Montevideo 
> statement?
>  
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> From: Jonathan Robinson
> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 5:10 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Questions for the ICANN Board
>  
> Please respond to this thread with any question/s you propose to raise 
> tomorrow

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>