Re: [council] RE: BGC Recommendation on Reconsideration Request 13-3

[Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Bruce.

Jonathan
On 18 Jun 2013 23:07, "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>  Just confirming that this has been posted to the Board Governance
> Committee and considered in its meeting today.****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> Bruce Tonkin****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 19 June 2013 6:03 AM
> *To:* Bruce Tonkin
> *Cc:* Cherine Chalaby; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* BGC Recommendation on Reconsideration Request 13-3****
>
> ** **
>
> Dear Board Governance Committee,
>  ****
>
>                 As you may be aware, the GNSO Council has had the
> opportunity to review the BGC Recommendation on Reconsideration Request
> 13-3, which can be found at
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/governance/reconsideration/recommendation-ncsg-16may13-en.pdf(Recommendation)
>  during its regular monthly Council meeting on June 16,
> 2013.   ****
>
> ** **
>
> Although the Council in no way intends to interfere with outcomes of
> Reconsideration Requests in general, some Councillors have voiced concerns
> with the implications of the rationale used by the BGC in support of the
> Recommendation.****
>
> ** **
>
>  These concerns were expressed during the Council call and on the Council
> mailing list and centre around the perceived potential impact of the
> Recommendation on the GNSO and more broadly, the bottom-up,
> multi-stakeholder model.
>  ****
>
>                 We therefore respectfully ask the BGC to thoroughly review
> the rationale of the Reconsideration Request and consider deferral of the
> publication of the rationale until such time that a more complete
> discussion on this matter can take place with the community in July at the
> ICANN meeting in Durban.****
>
>
> Sincerely,
>  ****
>
>
> Jonathan Robinson****
>
> GNSO Council Chair****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>