ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting - 16 May 2013

  • To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting - 16 May 2013
  • From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 15:46:48 -0700
  • Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac5ITuE4miJDWJGxQ3KMBIBGDpzVGw==
  • Thread-topic: Draft Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting - 16 May 2013

Dear Councillors,


Please find the draft agenda for the GNSO Council meeting on Thursday, 16 May 
2013 at 18:00 UTC. Please remember that all reports, motions  and documents for 
consideration are due no later than (NLT) 10 days in advance (i.e. MONDAY, 6 
May 2013 at 23:59 UTC) of the GNSO Council meeting on 16 May 2013 at 18:00 UTC

Draft Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting - 16 May 2013
http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-16may13-en.htm
Also published on the wiki at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+16+May+2013
Motions before Council are published on the wiki at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motion+16+May+2013
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures 
approved 13 September 2012 for the GNSO Council and updated.
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/gnso-operating-procedures-13sep12-en.pdf
For convenience:

 *   An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided 
in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
 *   An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee 
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
Meeting Times 18:00 UTC<http://tinyurl.com/bojlrbx>
http://tinyurl.com/d7gphxh

Coordinated Universal Time 18:00 UTC
11:00 Los Angeles; 14:00 Washington; 19:00 London; 20:00 Paris; 06:00 
Wellington (next day)
Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors should 
notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.
Item 1: Administrative matters (10 minutes)
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Statement of interest updates
1.3 Review/amend agenda
1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the GNSO 
Operating Procedures:
Draft Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 10 April 2013 
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg14553.html .If there 
are no comments, these minutes will be published on the website as approved, 
according to the GNSO Rules of 
Procedure<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/gnso-operating-procedures-13sep12-en.pdf>
 section  3.5  "If no objections are received within 10 days, the minutes will 
be deemed  to have been approved for posting" on 11 May 2013.
1.5. GNSO Projects List http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf & 
Action 
items<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items>
·                  Review main changes.
·                  Comments and/or questions.
Item 2: Opening Remarks from Chair (10 minutes)
Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics
Include brief review of Projects 
List<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf> and Action 
List<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items>
Item 3: Consent agenda ([0] minutes)
TBC.
Item 4: MOTION - To address the Final Issue Report on the Uniformity of 
Reporting (10 minutes)
At its October meeting last year the GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on 
the current state of uniformity in the mechanisms to initiate, track, and 
analyse policy-violation reports. ICANN Staff was also explicitly requested to 
provide its recommendation(s) on how this issue can be further addressed 
outside of a PDP if recommendations in relation to this issue do not require 
consensus policies to implement.
The Final Issue 
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/uofr-final-31mar13-en.pdf> was presented 
to the GNSO Council in Beijing. The Council will now consider a motion to form 
a non-PDP Working Group to consider additional methods for collecting necessary 
metrics and reporting from Contracted Parties and other external resources to 
aid the policy development process as outlined in the Final Issue Report.
Link to motion
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motion+16+May+2013
4.1 Reading of the motion (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben).
4.2 Discussion of motion.
4.3 Vote.
Item 5: MOTION - To adopt a revised Policy Development Process (PDP) Manual 
incorporating modifications to include the suspension of a PDP  (10 minutes)
In April 2012 the GNSO Council requested the Standing Committee on Improvements 
Implementation (SCI) to review whether or not there should be a modification to 
the GNSO PDP Manual to address the possible suspension of a PDP following its 
initiation;

The SCI deliberated on provisions for suspension of a PDP and reached consensus 
on proposed modifications to be incorporated in Section 15 of the GNSO PDP 
Manual, which also is included as Annex 2 in the GNSO Council Operating 
Procedures;

The revised PDP manual, including the proposed provisions for suspension of a 
PDP, was put out for a minimum 21-day public comment period on 06 March 2013 
ending on 06 April 2013 (see 
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/pdp-suspension-07mar13-en.htm) as 
required by the ICANN Bylaws.

The GNSO Council will now consider a motion to adopt the revised GNSO Operating 
Procedures.

Link to motion
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motion+16+May+2013
5.1 Reading of the motion (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben).
5.2 Discussion of motion.
5.3 Vote.
Item 6: MOTION - Initiation of a Policy Development Process (PDP) on the 
Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information (10 minutes)
A Final Issue Report translation and transliteration of contact information was 
submitted to the GNSO Council on 21 March 2013 (see 
http://gnso.icann.org/en/library).
The Final Issue Report recommends that the GNSO Council should initiate a 
Policy Development Process (PDP) limited to the issues discussed in this report 
but delay the next steps in the PDP until the Expert Working Group on gTLD 
Directory Services completes its recommendations, in May 2013 with a possible 
extension, in order to ensure that the resulting policy recommendations would 
be consistent with any new model or approaches to contact data that may result 
from the Expert Working Group's deliberations;
As recommended by the WHOIS Policy Review Team the Final Issue Report also 
recommends that ICANN should commission a study on the commercial feasibility 
of translation or transliteration systems for internationalized contact data, 
which is expected to help inform the PDP Working Group in its deliberations;
ICANN's General Counsel has confirmed that the topic is properly within the 
scope of the ICANN policy process and within the scope of the GNSO.
An overview of the Final Report was provided in Beijing. The Council is now 
expected to consider whether or not to initiate a PDP.
6.1 Reading of the motion (TBC)
6.2 Discussion
6.3 Next steps
Item 7: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Report on User Experience Implications of Active 
Variant TLDs & IDN Letter to the Board (20 mins)
During its meeting in Beijing, the ICANN Board requested that, by 1 July 2013, 
interested Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees provide staff with 
any input and guidance they may have to be factored into implementation of the 
Recommendations from the Report on User Experience Implications of Active 
Variant 
TLDs<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/idn/variant-tlds/active-ux-21mar13-en.pdf>'
 (see 
http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/prelim-report-11apr13-en.htm#2.a).
 The Report on User Experience Implications of Active Variant TLDs examines 
potential challenges from a user experience perspective when variants of IDN 
TLDs are activated and offers recommendations to users to minimize risks and 
optimize the implementation.

Ideally, input is requested on:
a)    Which recommendations if any, are pre-requisites to the delegation of any 
IDN variant TLDs (i.e., delegation of IDN Variant TLDs should not proceed until 
these recommendations are implemented),
b)    Which recommendations, if any, can be deferred until a later time, and
c)     c) Which recommendations, if any, require additional policy work by the 
ICANN community and should be referred to the relevant stakeholder group for 
further policy work

Furthermore, it was suggested that the GNSO Council should send a letter to the 
Board highlighting the importance of IDN related issues. A first draft of such 
letter was sent to the GNSO Council mailing list on 11/4 (see 
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg14489.html).

7.1 Update on Report on User Experience Implications of Active Variant TLDs 
(Steve Sheng)
7.2 Discussion
7.3 Next steps
7.4 Update on letter to the Board (Ching Ciao)
7.5 Discussion
7.6 Next steps
Item 8: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Planning for Durban (30 minutes)
Making the most out of the face-to-face meeting time available at the ICANN 
Meeting in Durban will take planning.  GNSO Council VC Wolf-Ulrich Knoben is 
working with staff to lead this effort.
The Council has the opportunity to feed into plans and provide input based on 
experience in Beijing.  Included in this item will be the opportunity to shape 
the topics and substance of the Council's proposed meetings with other groups 
in Durban such as the CCNSO, the GAC and the ICANN board.
8.1 - Update (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
8.2 - Discussion
8.3 - Next steps
Item 9: Any Other Business (5 minutes)
9.1 - Updated dates for Q4 2013 GNSO Council meetings.  Changed to accommodate 
Buenos Aires meeting dates.
9.2 - Additional day for Buenos Aires.  Induction and preparation session for 
the new GNSO Council.
Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO 
Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or 
other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting 
thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than 
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in 
Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an 
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than 
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO 
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative 
vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) 
of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an 
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved 
under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter 
through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final 
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a 
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO 
Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups 
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting 
Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of 
the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority 
vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the 
ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the 
GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council 
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority 
of the other House."
Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures 
4.4<http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf>)
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council 
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced 
time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's adjournment. In 
exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may 
reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided 
such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes 
according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for 
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by 
telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become 
available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a 
quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local time between March and October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 18:00 UTC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA 
(PST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html>) 
UTC-8+1DST 11:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-5+1DST 14:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+1DST 15:00
Montevideo, Uruguay 
(UYST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/uyst.html>) 
UTC-3+1DST 15:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 19:00
Abuja, Nigeria 
(WAT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/africa/wat.html>)
 UTC+1+0DST 19:00
Bonn, Germany (CEST) UTC+1+0DST 20:00
Stockholm, Sweden (CET) UTC+1+0DST 20:00
Ramat Hasharon, 
Israel(IST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/ist-israel.html>)
 UTC+2+0DST 21:00
Karachi, Pakistan 
(PKT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/pkt.html> 
) UTC+5+0DST 23:00
Beijing/Hong Kong, China (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 02:00 (next day)
Perth, Australia 
(WST<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html>) 
UTC+8+0DST 02:00 (next day)
Wellington, New Zealand 
(NZDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/pacific/nzdt.html>
 ) UTC+12+1DST 06:00 (next day)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2013, 2:00 or 3:00 local time 
(with exceptions)
For other times see:
http://tinyurl.com/d7gphxh
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>