ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] [Soac-infoalert] Upcoming invite for ATRT 2

  • To: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx>, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] [Soac-infoalert] Upcoming invite for ATRT 2
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 03:00:24 -0700
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Cc: "<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <469EF556-C4C8-4B0A-AE4E-95AC0AF9DC7C@uzh.ch>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac2iFxTS2wp/qNj/QCCqziXvdeayfQ==
  • Thread-topic: [council] [Soac-infoalert] Upcoming invite for ATRT 2
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824

FYI, the process agreed by the GNSO Council for the first ATRT can be found 
here: http://gnso.icann.org/en/aoc-reviews.

With best regards,

Marika

From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx<mailto:william.drake@xxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday 4 October 2012 11:52
To: Stéphane Van Gelder 
<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>" 
<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>, 
"council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] [Soac-infoalert] Upcoming invite for ATRT 2

Hi

Stéphane, are you suggesting we should not follow the procedure we agreed for 
the first ATRT?  We spent a hell of a lot of cycles on that and came by 
attrition to what seemed like the only model that was politically acceptable to 
all four SGs.  What would be the case for reinventing it, are there problems 
with it, and solutions you think would be more acceptable to all than what 
we've done?

Thanks,

Bill

On Oct 4, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:

I agree with Wolf.

This process needs to be done right. Wolf, can we pick this up as a lead topic 
for the weekend brainstorming session, or give it a topic of its own?

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 3 oct. 2012 à 19:29, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>> 
<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>> a écrit :

I think this process has to be carefully thought about on council level. I 
remember longlasting discussions during the selection of ATRT 1 members. We 
should clearly know how many GNSO nominees shall be admitted.
It could be an item for the weekend sessions.


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2012 18:00
An: GNSO Council
Betreff: [council] Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Upcoming invite for ATRT 2

Councillors, FYI.

This will need to be picked up by the new Leadership team post Toronto.

Thanks,

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM NetNames France
----------------
Registry Relations and Strategy Director
NetNames
T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61


Début du message réexpédié :

De : Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Objet : [Soac-infoalert] Upcoming invite for ATRT 2
Date : 2 octobre 2012 11:23:21 HAEC
À : "soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>>

Dear SO/AC Chairs,

As prescribed by the Affirmation of Commitments (AoC), ICANN is to organize a 
review of its accountability and transparency commitments no less frequently 
than every three years. For full information, please refer to section 9.1 of 
the Affirmation of Commitments 
http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/aoc/affirmation-of-commitments-30sep09-en.htm.

In terms of Review Team composition, the AoC stipulates that: The review will 
be performed by volunteer community members […], and will include the following 
(or their designated nominees): the Chair of the GAC, the Chair of the Board of 
ICANN, the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information of the DOC, 
representatives of the relevant ICANN Advisory Committees and Supporting 
Organizations and independent experts. Composition of the review team will be 
agreed jointly by the Selectors: the Chair of the GAC (in consultation with GAC 
members) and the Chair of the Board of ICANN.

The first ATRT was launched in early 2010 and delivered its final report on 31 
December 2010. For further information, refer to: 
http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt

Please note that in accordance with the AoC timeframe, the release of the Call 
for Applicants for the second Accountability & Transparency Review Team (ATRT 
2) is imminent.

The Call for Applicants invites interested individuals to apply for a position 
of Volunteer Review Team Member, in representation of a Supporting Organization 
or Advisory Committee, and/or for a position of Independent Expert on the 
second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT 2). Details on the 
mandate, missions, desired skill set and application process will be included 
in the Call for Applicants.

Applications received for a position of SO/AC representative on the ATRT 2 will 
be forwarded to the Supporting Organization or Advisory Committee identified by 
the candidate for endorsement. Should your SO/AC require additional information 
from applicants to reach your decision on endorsement, please inform Staff as 
soon as you can so that it may be included in the process. SO/AC endorsement 
will be factored into the selection of the ATRT 2 Members.

The Call for Applicants also solicits independent experts to serve on the ATRT 
2. Candidates will be considered and appointed by Selectors.


Given SO/ACs' key role in the application process, Staff would like to share 
the following schedule with you:

 *   5 October 2012 – Publication of the Call for Applicants for the position 
of Volunteer Review team Member and Independent Expert
 *   5 December 2012 – Deadline to submit applications
 *   17 December 2012 – SO/ACs reveal the names of endorsed candidates
 *   7 January 2013 – Selectors announce the composition of the Review Team
 *   Week of 21 January 2013 - Kick–off meeting

Please kindly note that should your SO/AC or constituency wish to discuss this 
process, Staff is prepared to join your sessions in Toronto or to attend 
conference calls depending on your availability to provide you with an outline 
of the application process. Should you have any immediate questions, please 
also feel free to email them to 
olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx<applewebdata://89A00B2B-7D06-4B7A-A9DF-845D440FFD11> 
and alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx<applewebdata://89A00B2B-7D06-4B7A-A9DF-845D440FFD11>

Thanks,

Very best regards

Olof Nordling & Alice Jansen

----

Alice Jansen
Organizational Reviews Manager
ICANN
Rond Point Schuman 6,
1st floor
B-1040 Brussels
Belgium
Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56
Skype: alice_jansen_icann
Email: alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
soac-infoalert mailing list
soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>