ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Jonathan Robinson - Attendance on GNSO Call & Council Proxy

  • To: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.r.mail99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Jonathan Robinson - Attendance on GNSO Call & Council Proxy
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:40:29 +0100
  • Cc: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx, 'Glen de Saint Géry' <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <CACO13-Ttq3S2_S++KpTS0xh4PouRYQU8fG7iW6PR52Kqpy9e7Q@mail.gmail.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D544E302-F685-4971-906C-43F295B96319@uzh.ch> <CACO13-Ttq3S2_S++KpTS0xh4PouRYQU8fG7iW6PR52Kqpy9e7Q@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bill, Jonathan,

Thanks to you both for the heads-up. The motion will stay on the agenda but we 
now know we can expect a request for it to be deferred once we get to that 
agenda item in tomorrow's meeting.

Stéphane



Le 18 janv. 2012 à 14:20, Jonathan Robinson a écrit :

> Hi Bil,
> 
> Deferral ok. Is San Jose the next meeting?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse brevity or typographical errors.
> 
> 
>> On 18 Jan 2012 13:15, "William Drake" <william.drake@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jonathan
>> 
>> We've been discussing the CCWG issue in NCSG and were thinking we might want 
>> to defer consider of the motion anyway, so if you're not going to be on 
>> tomorrow perhaps it'd be best to work it through F2F in San Jose when you're 
>> able to present.  Ok?
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 18, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
>> 
>> > Dear Stéphane,
>> >  
>> > I am obliged to tra...
>> 
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>