Re: [council] Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Marika.

Thanks to the IPC for submitting these. Councillors, please send to your 
respective groups as required.

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 10 janv. 2012 à 10:36, Marika Konings a écrit :

> Dear All,
> 
> Please find attached the comments from the IPC on the staff proposals in 
> relation to IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2. As these comments 
> were received after the closing of the public comment forum and the 
> submission of the proposals to the Council, these are provided to you 
> directly for your consideration. ICANN Staff is planning to provide its 
> feedback on the IPC comments separately so that you have the opportunity to 
> review our opinion on these comments also as part of your deliberations.
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> From: "Winterfeldt, Brian" <bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 18:02:12 -0800
> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Murray, Emily" <emurray@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Barry, Korey" <Kbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2
> 
> Dear Marika,
> Thank you very much for your response. Please find attached the IPC’s 
> comments on the above-mentioned issues, which have now been approved by the 
> IPC.  We would greatly appreciate it if the comments could be considered and 
> if the proposals could be revised, if warranted.
> 
> We sincerely appreciate your flexibility and consideration during the busy 
> year-end and holiday period.
> 
> Best regards,
> Brian
>  
> Brian J. Winterfeldt, Esq.
> Steptoe & Johnson LLP
>  
>  
>> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: January 4, 2012 3:43:52 AM EST
>> To: "Winterfeldt, Brian" <bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2
>> 
>> Dear Brian,
>>  
>> As the proposals have already been submitted to the GNSO Council and the 
>> public comment forum has been closed, it might make more sense to raise the 
>> IPC's comments as part of the Council's deliberations on the proposals, 
>> unless the Council prefers that Staff considers the IPC comments first and 
>> revises the proposals, if necessary, based on the comments.    
>>  
>> Best regards,
>>  
>> Marika
>>  
>> From: "Winterfeldt, Brian" <bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:56:37 -0800
>> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: RE: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2
>>  
>> Dear Marika,
>>  
>> I hope you enjoyed the holiday break!  Unfortunately due to everyone's 
>> hectic schedule surrounding the holidays, we were a bit delayed in composing 
>> comments on both of these recommendations on behalf of the IPC.  
>> Accordingly, we are planning to submit comments on behalf of the IPC later 
>> this week on these issues.  Please let us know if that is okay, or if we are 
>> too late to do so.
>>  
>> Thank you and looking forward to working together in 2012!
>> 
>> Best,
>>  
>> Brian
>>  
>> Brian J. Winterfeldt, Esq.
>> Steptoe & Johnson LLP
>>  
>>  
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Marika Konings
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 6:45 AM
>> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [council] Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 
>> part 2
>>  
>> Dear All,
>>  
>> First of all, best wishes for 2012!
>>  
>> As you may recall, the GNSO Council resolved in June of last year in 
>> relation to two of the IRTP Part B recommendations (recommendation #8 
>> concerning the standardization and clarification of Whois status messages 
>> regarding Registrar Lock status and recommendation #9 part 2 concerning a 
>> new provision to lock and unlock domain names) to request ICANN staff to 
>> provide proposals. In consultation with the IRTP Part B Working Group, ICANN 
>> Staff prepared these proposals which were subsequently put out for public 
>> comment (see 
>> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-22nov11-en.htm). As no 
>> comments were received as part of the public comment forum, these proposals 
>> are now submitted to the GNSO Council for its consideration (see attached). 
>>  
>> If you have any questions, please let me know.
>>  
>> With best regards,
>>  
>> Marika
> <IPC Comments on IRTP Part B Staff Proposals No  8  No  9 Part 2.doc>