ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2

  • To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:58:08 +0100
  • Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <CB28A8E0.1DA73%marika.konings@icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <CB28A8E0.1DA73%marika.konings@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks Marika.

I think it would be helpful for the Council to have two motions to consider at 
its next meeting, so that these staff proposals can be acted upon.

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 3 janv. 2012 à 12:45, Marika Konings a écrit :

> Dear All,
> 
> First of all, best wishes for 2012!
> 
> As you may recall, the GNSO Council resolved in June of last year in relation 
> to two of the IRTP Part B recommendations (recommendation #8 concerning the 
> standardization and clarification of Whois status messages regarding 
> Registrar Lock status and recommendation #9 part 2 concerning a new provision 
> to lock and unlock domain names) to request ICANN staff to provide proposals. 
> In consultation with the IRTP Part B Working Group, ICANN Staff prepared 
> these proposals which were subsequently put out for public comment (see 
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-22nov11-en.htm). As no 
> comments were received as part of the public comment forum, these proposals 
> are now submitted to the GNSO Council for its consideration (see attached). 
> 
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika
> <IRTP Recommendation #9 Part 2 - Proposal from ICANN Staff - 22 November 
> 2011.pdf><IRTP Recommendation #8 - Proposal from ICANN Staff - 22 November 
> 2011.pdf>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>