Re: [council] GNSO related Board resolutions out of the Dakar meeting

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Absolutely right Jeff, thanks for making that clarification.

Stéphane



Le 31 oct. 2011 à 16:23, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :

> With respect to the Resolution 7, just as a correction, it is not a “possible 
> PDP”, but this is the required prelude to the required PDP.  We the Council 
> must initiate a PDP as soon as the final issue report is presented to the 
> Council. 
>  
> There is no discretion for the Council here to refuse to initiate the PDP.  
> It is automatic according to the Bylaws.
>  
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 
>  
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
>  
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 10:46 AM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] GNSO related Board resolutions out of the Dakar meeting
>  
> Councillors,
>  
> Please see the Board resolutions from the Dakar meeting: 
> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-28oct11-en.htm
>  
> Resolution 1.5 addresses the PEDNR recommendations which the Board adopted.
>  
> Resolution 1.12 thanks the departing Councillors.
>  
> Resolution 2 addresses the JAS work and requests that Staff look at 
> implementation of that work.
>  
> Resolution 7 addresses the RAA. The is a request for an issue report, as a 
> prelude to a possible PDP.
>  
> Resolution 8 initiates a comment period on the recommendations of the PDP WT.
>  
> Stéphane
>