ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] CCWG-DT: Final Charter and Draft Motion

  • To: "jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council List'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] CCWG-DT: Final Charter and Draft Motion
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:28:11 -0400
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • In-reply-to: <008301cc7eec$ebe50c20$c3af2460$@robinson@ipracon.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <008301cc7eec$ebe50c20$c3af2460$@robinson@ipracon.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acx+5lX3SnycjfhjS3Gu6duGsZVi5QABexrwAACS1DA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] CCWG-DT: Final Charter and Draft Motion

Jonathan - to clarify, you say below "It will be very helpful to have this 
motion tabled and, ideally, approved ahead of Dakar."

Do you mean it will be helpful to NOT have the motion tabled.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 5:16 PM
To: 'GNSO Council List'
Subject: [council] CCWG-DT: Final Charter and Draft Motion

All,

Please find attached, documents relating to a proposed motion for our 
forthcoming council meeting on 6th October 2011.

It will be very helpful to have this motion tabled and, ideally, approved ahead 
of Dakar.
In addition, I believe that it is a primarily administrative piece of business 
for the GNSO to deal with this motion.

Accordingly, I respectfully request a waiver of the 8 day rule which this 
submission has breached by less than 24 hours.

Best wishes,


Jonathan




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>