<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: AW: [council] Updated Council agenda 21 July 2011 at 11:00 UTC
I meant AOB item 11.2, not 10.2. Sorry about that.
Stéphane
Le 20 juil. 2011 à 12:29, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
> Thanks for an excellent suggestion re the elections Wolf. However, I fear
> that we already have a very full agenda and may not get to it.
>
> Still, let's add an AOB 10.2 and see if we manage to get there before our 2
> hours are up. I think the discussion will be useful, not least because with
> our next meeting being in September, we will have to have taken a decision on
> how to handle the elections by then.
>
> Glen, please add that AOB on the agenda. Thanks.
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
> Le 20 juil. 2011 à 11:44, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
>> Thanks for the agenda,
>>
>> is it of interest to resume - under AOB - the election timeline discussion
>> and to decide whether the SCI should come up with a revised process proposal
>> for future elections?
>> Unforseeably I've got a business task which necessitates me leaving the call
>> tomorrow from around 11:30 to 12:15 UTC. My apologies for that.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
>> Auftrag von Glen de Saint Géry
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juli 2011 23:59
>> An: Council GNSO
>> Betreff: [council] Updated Council agenda 21 July 2011 at 11:00 UTC
>>
>> Dear Councillors,
>>
>> Please find the updated Council agenda for 21 July, 2011 at 11:00 UTC.
>> The main updates that have been made are moving all the agenda items
>> requiring a vote to the beginning of the agenda and placing the IRTP B
>> recommendation #3 as a separate item.
>>
>> The Wiki agenda, (which has the latest updates) is posted at
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+21+July+2011
>>
>> The motions before Council are posted on the Wiki at:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2011
>>
>> Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting 21 July 2011.
>> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-21jul11-en.htm
>>
>> This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating
>> Procedures approved 7 April 2011 for the GNSO Council.
>> http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-op-procedures-08apr11-en.pdf
>> For convenience:
>> * An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided
>> in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
>> * An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee
>> voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
>> Meeting Time 11:00 UTC
>>
>> Coordinated Universal Time:11:00 UTC - see below for local times
>> (04:00 Los Angeles, 07:00 Washington DC, 12:00 London, 13:00 Brussels, 20:00
>> Tokyo; 21:00 Melbourne
>>
>> Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors
>> should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.
>>
>> GNSO Council meeting audiocast
>> http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u
>> Item 1: Administrative matters (10 minutes)
>>
>> 1.1 Roll Call
>>
>> 1.2 Updated statement of interest
>> Rosemary Sinclair
>> http://gnso.icann.org/council/soi/sinclair-soi-22jun11.htm
>>
>>
>> 1.3 Review/amend agenda
>>
>> 1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the
>> GNSO Operating Procedures:
>> • 22 June 2011 Council minutes – approved on 6 July 2011.
>> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-22jun11-en.htm
>>
>> Item 2: Update to Pending Projects List – Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy
>> Part B Working Group (5 minutes)
>> Standard agenda item to update the Council on the GNSO's Pending Projects.
>> Refer to Pending Projects list
>> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf
>>
>> 2.1 Changes to Pending Projects List since last Council meeting (Stéphane
>> Van Gelder)
>>
>>
>> • GNSO activities: 10 (9 – Open Council Meeting DT added).
>> • Other activities: 9 (7 – GNSO toolkit of services removed, IRTP B rec 8,
>> IRTP B rec 9 and IRTP C issues report added).
>> • Joint SO/AC WGs: 7 (7 – no change).
>> • Outstanding recommendations: 2 (1 – IRTP B remaining recs added).
>> Item 3: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part B Working Group -
>> recommendation # 3 (10 minutes)
>>
>> Refer to Motion 1 to address IRTP Part B recommendation #3
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2011
>>
>> 3.1 Reading of the motion (Tim Ruiz)
>>
>> 3.2 Discussion
>>
>> 3.3 Vote
>>
>> Item 4: Joint ccNSO-GNSO Internationalized Domain Names Working Group (JIG)
>> (10 minutes)
>>
>> Action item from the Singapore ICANN meeting: the JIG's current charter does
>> not allow it to continue working, yet the JIG reported to the GNSO Council
>> in Singapore that it still has some work to do.
>>
>> A motion is being submitted to extend the JIG's charter
>>
>> Refer to motion 2
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2011
>> 4.1 Reading of the motion (Rafik Dammak)
>> 4.2 Discussion
>> 4.3 Vote
>> Item 5: Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) (15 minutes)
>> The group has sent its Final Report for the GNSO Council's consideration on
>> June 14, 2011
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+June+2011
>>
>> A motion has been made to approve this report.
>>
>> Refer to motion 3
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2011
>> 5.1 Reading of the motion (Tim Ruiz)
>> 5. 2 Discussion
>> 5. 3 Vote
>> Item 6: Policy Development Process Work Team (PDP-WT) (10 minutes)
>> The group has put its proposed Final Report out for public comment
>> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pdp-wt-final-report-final-31may11-en.pdf
>>
>> A public comment period closed on July 9.
>> Summary of public comments
>> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/report-comments-pdp-final-report-11jul11-en.pdf
>>
>> A motion has been made for the Council to consider this report.
>>
>> Refer to motion 4
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2011
>> 6.1 Reading of the motion (Jeff Neuman)
>> 6.2 Discussion
>> 6.3 Vote
>> Item 7: Registration abuse (RAP) (15 minutes)
>> Following recent discussions on the matter, the Council is being asked to
>> consider a motion to address the remaining recommendations of the RAP WG.
>> This motion is being presented for discussion only at this meeting, in order
>> to give the Council and its SGs sufficient time to properly assess it.
>>
>> Refer to motion 5
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2011
>> 7.1 Update from Staff and reading of potential motion
>> 7.2 Discussion
>> Item 8: Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support (JAS) (15 minutes)
>>
>> As part of its resolutions on the new gTLD program, the ICANN Board passed a
>> resolved clause during its June 20 meeting in Singapore which contained the
>> following excerpt (Resolved 4.d):
>>
>> The review of additional community feedback, advice from ALAC, and
>> recommendations from the GNSO following their receipt of a Final Report from
>> the JAS Working Group (requested in time to allow staff to develop an
>> implementation plan for the Board’s consideration at its October 2011
>> meeting in Dakar, Senegal), with the goal of having a sustainable applicant
>> support system in place before the opening of the application window.
>>
>> At its Singapore wrap-up meeting, the GNSO Council identified the following
>> timeline if the Board request is to be answered in time: For the Board to
>> approve the JAS implementation plan in Dakar on October 28, the Staff must
>> publish all documents for the Dakar meeting 15 business days before Dakar,
>> so October 7. So that means the Council must approve the JAS Final Report at
>> its September 8 meeting.
>>
>> This discussion item aims at identifying how these objectives can best be
>> met.
>> Refer to Board June 20 2011 motion on new gTLDs:
>> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-20jun11-en.htm
>> 8.1 Discussion
>> 8.2 Possibility of a special meeting of the Council in August (first week of
>> the month) on the JAS final report.
>> Item 9: June 20 Board resolution on new gTLDs (15 minutes)
>>
>> As part of its resolutions on the new gTLD program, the ICANN Board passed a
>> resolved clause during its June 20 meeting in Singapore which contained the
>> following excerpt (Resolved 1.b):
>>
>> Incorporation of text concerning protection for specific requested Red Cross
>> and IOC names for the top level only during the initial application round,
>> until the GNSO and GAC develop policy advice based on the global public
>> interest.
>>
>> As an action item, the GNSO therefore needs to look at providing the
>> requested advice or at least consider whether it wants to provide advice and
>> if so, how should these entities' names be handled at the second level in
>> new gTLDs?
>> Refer to Board June 20 2011 motion on new gTLDs:
>> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-20jun11-en.htm
>> 9.1 Discussion
>> 9.2 Next steps
>> Item 10: Interaction with ccNSO (10 minutes)
>> Action item from the Singapore ICANN meeting: the ccNSO and the GNSO agreed
>> to try and work together more closely on some projects of common interest.
>> Two were discussed: the work the ccNSO is currently doing on ICANN's
>> strategic plan and budget, and the work the GNSO is currently doing on CWGs.
>> This is a discussion item to ascertain how to push these two initiatives
>> forward.
>> 10.1 Discussion
>> 10.2 Next steps
>> Item 11. Any Other Business (5 minutes)
>>
>> 11.1 Consumer Choice, Competition and Innovation Working Group (Rosemary
>> Sinclair)
>> Discussion of motion to approve a charter for a Joint Community Working
>> Group to be made at the next Council meeting to respond to the Board's
>> Cartagena request for advice from the GNSO, GAC, ALAC and CCNSO.
>>
>> Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section
>> 3)
>>
>> 9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the
>> GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council
>> motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House.
>> The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO
>> actions:
>> 1. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than 25%
>> vote of each House or majority of one House;
>> 2. Initiate a Policy Development Process (“PDP”) Within Scope (as described
>> in Annex A): requires an affirmative vote of more than 33% of each House or
>> more than 66% of one House;
>> 3. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of more
>> than 75% of one House and a majority of the other House (“GNSO
>> Supermajority”);
>> 4. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
>> affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one
>> GNSO Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups
>> supports the Recommendation;
>> 5. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
>> affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority; and
>> 6. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain
>> Contracting Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that “a
>> two-thirds vote of the council” demonstrates the presence of a consensus,
>> the GNSO Supermajority vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded with
>> respect to any contracting party affected by such contract provision.
>>
>> Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures 4.4)
>> 4.4.1 Applicability
>> Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council
>> motions or measures.
>> a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
>> b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
>> c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN
>> Bylaws;
>> d. Fill a Council position open for election.
>> 4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the
>> announced time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting‟s
>> adjournment. In exceptional circumstances,announced at the time of the vote,
>> the Chair may reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar
>> days, provided such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs
>> present.
>> 4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee
>> votes according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for
>> transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting
>> by telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may
>> become available.
>> 4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be
>> a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.
>> Local time between March & October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 11:00
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> California, USA (PDT) UTC-7+1DST 04:00
>> Cedar Rapids, USA (CDT) UTC-5+1DST 06:00
>> New York/Washington DC, USA (EDT) UTC-5+1DST 07:00
>> Buenos Aires, Argentina UTC-3+0DST 08:00
>> Rio de Janeiro/Sao Paulo Brazil UTC-3+0DST 08:00
>> London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+1DST 12:00
>> Tunis, Tunisia (CET)UTC+1+0DST 12:00
>> Darmstadt, Germany (CET) UTC+1+1DST 13:00
>> Paris, France (CET) UTC+1+1DST 13:00
>> Moscow, Russian Federation UTC+3+1DST 15:00
>> Karachi, Pakistan UTC+5+0DST 16:00
>> Beijing, China UTC+8+0DST 19:00
>> Tokyo, Japan UTC+9+0DST 20:00
>> Melbourne,/Sydney Australia (EST) UTC+10+0DST 21:00
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2011, 2:00 or 3:00 local time
>> (with exceptions)
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>> Thank you.
>> Kind regards,
>> Glen
>>
>> Glen de Saint Géry
>> GNSO Secretariat
>> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://gnso.icann.org
>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|