RE: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN

[Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am not sure to what end?
Why would we discuss this?
Haven’t we already got a full agenda? Why is this particular letter so 
important. I am not convinced the GNSO Council is in a position to respond nor 
assist here...
Adrian Kinderis


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, 17 June 2011 5:45 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN

Despite the unfortunate timing (16 June) I think this is an important 
development and support discussing it on Saturday. We may need to have a follow 
up discussion, but it would be good to have at least an initial conversation as 
soon as possible.

Cheers
Mary

Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From:

Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>

To:

GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

6/17/2011 5:40 AM

Subject:

[council] NTIA letter to ICANN

Councillors,

For those of you that haven't seen this, here is a link to the letter NTIA has 
sent to ICANN re the new gTLD program.

 
http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/strickling-to-dengate-thrush-16jun11-en.pdf

This is one of the topics that we could discuss during our Saturday morning 
session, if there is interest in doing so.

Stéphane