Re: [council] PROPOSED MOTION to Acknowledge Receipt of the final PDP-WT Report

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Very helpful, thanks Jeff.

Stéphane



Le 1 juin 2011 à 13:04, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :

> Thanks for your questions Stephane.  Please note that the latest redline of 
> the report can be found at:  
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/2.+PDP-WT+Documents+%28Drafts+-+Published%29.
>   I have also enclosed a copy of our “Public Comments Review Tool” which 
> shows summaries of the comments received and the PDP-WT’s discussion of those 
> items and where we came out on those issues.  I just realized the 
> announcement did not link to these docs.  Perhaps we can add those?
>  
> With respect to your question on the existing threshold to approve a request 
> for an issue report, the PDP-WT came to the conclusion that other than the 
> clarification you cite below, we did not want to change any of the existing 
> thresholds at this point in time as we felt like this should be addressed as 
> part of the overall functioning of the GNSO during its next scheduled review. 
>  Although certain members of the group had their own opinions as to whether 
> these should be changed, the group ultimately felt like there was just not 
> enough data on PDPs commenced under the new structure to make a good 
> assessment as to whether they needed to be changed.  We added a couple of 
> thresholds to cover things that were not previously addressed (like approval 
> of a charter – which technically is not required now).
>  
> I hope that helps.
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> Please note new address:  21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166    
>  
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
>  
>  
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 5:30 AM
> To: Neuman, Jeff
> Cc: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] PROPOSED MOTION to Acknowledge Receipt of the final 
> PDP-WT Report
>  
> Jeff,
>  
> In anticipation of our discussions on this during our meeting, I have a 
> question which I missed the first time I read this report, before it was 
> amended to take into account the latest comment period.
>  
> I see the group recommends that the definition of a GNSO Supermajority be 
> changed to include what the group calls "the original meaning of a GNSO 
> Supermajority". I was wondering if the group had also considered changing the 
> voting requirements to approve a request for an issues report, which 
> currently has a 25% threshold, the lowest threshold we have?
>  
> Also, can you tell me if a redline of the latest report exists, showing the 
> changes made in response to the latest batch of comments received? That would 
> be of help in understanding the changes the group has seen fit to make as a 
> result of the comments.
>  
> Once again, congratulations to both the PPSC, the PDP-WT and their respective 
> Staff support for the quality of this work.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Stéphane
>  
>  
>  
> Le 31 mai 2011 à 21:32, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
> 
> 
> All,
>  
> Please find enclosed a motion to acknowledge receipt of the PDP-WT Final 
> Report.  The motion asks that the Council immediately begin a 30-day comment 
> period.  Please keep in mind that we have just completed a public comment 
> period on the Proposed Final Report during the San Francisco meeting, but 
> have made a couple of changes that we believe should be reviewed by the 
> community in response to previous comments.  In addition, given the 
> significance of the proposed changes, another comment period is probably a 
> good idea.
> 
> The goal would be to vote on the recommendations themselves during our July 
> meeting.
> 
> Thanks.
>  
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> Please note new address:  21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166    
>  
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
>  
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Marika Konings
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:04 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] PDP-WT Final Report
>  
> Dear All,
>  
> On behalf of the PDP-WT, please find attached the PDP-WT Final Report. For 
> your information, the Work Team is scheduled to provide you with an overview 
> of the proposed new GNSO Policy Development Process and answer any questions 
> you may have on Sunday 19 June from 14.45 – 15.40 (local time) at the ICANN 
> meeting in Singapore.
>  
> With best regards,
>  
> Marika
> <Motion to Acknowledge the Receipt of the PDP-WT Final Report - 30 May 
> 2011.doc>
>  
> <PDP-WT - Public Comments Review Tool - Proposed Final Report - Updated 24 
> May 2011.pdf>