Re: AW: [council] Joint DNS security and stability analysis working group

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Wolf,

We are certainly not in a position to allocate yet another seat. We need to get 
down to 10 or less before we can do that.

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 23 févr. 2011 à 12:07, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Stéphane,
>  
> sorry to go the other direction: I'd like to request 1 seat for an ISPCP 
> volunteer. She/he will be named after co-ordinating your request within the 
> CSG.
>  
> 
> Best regards 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> 
> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
> Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Februar 2011 23:53
> An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Council
> Betreff: [council] Joint DNS security and stability analysis working group
> 
> Councillors,
> 
> We have an item on our agenda for Thursday's meeting on the DSSA WG 
> (http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-24feb11-en.htm).
> 
> I have been informed by the ccNSO that they are requesting we limit the 
> number of volunteers from the GNSO to 10 for this WG.
> 
> At the moment, we have 12 volunteers:
> Zahid Jamil (CBUC)
> 
> Scott McCormick (CBUC)
> 
> Mikey O'Connor (CBUC)
> 
> George Asare-Sakyi (NCSG)
> 
> Rafik Dammak (NCSG)
> 
> Matt Serlin - (MarkMonitor, RrSG))
> 
> Rick Wilhelm (Networksolutions RrSG)
> 
> Greg Aaron (Afilias, RySG)
> 
> Keith Drazek (Verisign, RySG)
> 
> Don Blumenthal (PIR, RySG)
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh (IPC)
> 
> Adam Palmer (CBUC)
> 
> 
> We will need to discuss how to limit our numbers on Thursday. In order to get 
> that discussion going now, I would like to start by asking any of those who 
> have volunteered if they would be willing to step aside in order to help us 
> get down to the 10-volunteer maximum.
> 
> Stéphane