Re: [council] FW: ALAC Statement on GNSO WG Guidelines

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

What does Alac mean by "even more proactive" Alan?

Stéphane

Envoyé de mon iPhone4

Le 17 févr. 2011 à 17:33, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> I *think* I understand the rationale behind the specific wording, but I will 
> seek clarification to make sure that I am correct.
> 
> I believe that the ALAC is supporting the current process, and suggesting 
> that the GNSO be even more pro-active, specifically with the ACs which do not 
> routinely participate. The ALAC has been active in  such WG over the last 
> several years, but the same cannot be said for the other ACs.  History 
> indicates that public calls for participation alone are generally not 
> sufficient.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 17/02/2011 09:10 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
>> If Alan can speak to this at the Council meeting on the 24th that would be 
>> helpful.
>>  
>> The current document (Section 2.1.1) states that when there is a Working 
>> Group a “Call for Volunteers” will be circulated “as widely as 
>> possible in order to ensure broad representation and participation in the 
>> Working Group.”  This includes “Distribution of announcement to GNSO 
>> Stakeholder groups, Constituencies and/or other Supporting Organizations and 
>> Advisory Committees.”
>>  
>> It sounds as if the ALAC is just affirming their support, but it would be 
>> helpful to get some clarity.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>>  
>>  
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>> 
>> 
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
>> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
>> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
>> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and 
>> delete the original message.
>>  
>>  
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
>> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 8:59 AM
>> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [council] FW: ALAC Statement on GNSO WG Guidelines
>>  
>> I'm not sure I understand the concerns regarding the involvement of the
>> ACs. All stakeholders have been invited/permitted to be involved in GNSO
>> policy WGs since we've been using them with or without guidelines. Is
>> the ALAC simply encouraging that to continue, or are there specific
>> concerns that the guidelines are lacking in that regard?
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>> > -------- Original Message --------
>> > Subject: [council] FW: ALAC Statement on GNSO WG Guidelines
>> > From: Glen de Saint Géry
>> > Date: Thu, February 17, 2011 3:26 am
>> > To: Council GNSO 
>> >  
>> > Forwarded From: ICANN At-Large Staff 
>> > 
>> > Dear GNSO Secretariat,
>> >  
>> > On behalf of Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, we have the honor 
>> > to transmit to you the ALAC Statement on the GNSO WG Guidelines.
>> >  
>> > We would appreciate if you could forward this Statement to the GNSO Chair 
>> > and Vice-Chairs for consideration at the GNSO Council Meeting scheduled 
>> > for 24 February 2011. 
>> >  
>> > The ALAC welcomes any comments the GNSO Council may wish to make by reply.
>> >  
>> > Regards,
>> > 
>> > Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-White, 
>> > Marilyn Vernon, 
>> > ICANN At-Large Staff
>> >  
>> > 
>