ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] First steps towards prioritization

  • To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] First steps towards prioritization
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:17:53 +0100
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: 
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; 
">Councillors,<div><br></div><div>During our Cartagena wrap-up meeting, the 
Council requested that the Chairs take a stab at prioritizing our ongoing 
projects.</div><div><br></div><div>The Council Leaders have been working on 
this since then with a view to first of all identifying those projects that 
have either been ongoing for the longest time or do not seem to be very 
active.</div><div><br></div><div>Our first review has made it clear that the 
Travel DT is no longer active and Olga, the Chair of the group, does not object 
to it being closed for now (and reopened at a later date if 
required).</div><div><br></div><div>Closing the Travel DT is therefore the 
first executive decision we are making. It will be removed from the Pending 
Projects list. If anyone objects, please say so by COB Tuesday Jan 
4.</div><div><br></div><div>Next is the VI WG. The&nbsp;Council passed a 
resolution in Cartagena to end the WG. I am asking Staff to remove it from the 
PP list as of now.</div><div><br></div><div>Next is the Geo Regions WG. Olga is 
also Chair of this group and reports that there is still ongoing activity. I 
have therefore asked Staff to update the PP list with Olga's report and to keep 
this WG on the active list.</div><div><br></div><div>Last project on this 
initial review is the Fast Flux WG. This has seen no Council action since 2009. 
In order to close this completely, the best course of action seems to be to 
transfer what remains to the RAP group. I am therefore making a motion in this 
regard. Please find the motion attached and reprinted 
below.</div><div><br></div><div>A second would be 
appreciated.</div><div><br></div><div>Once this initial effort at 
prioritization is concluded, the Council Leaders will then look at trying to 
rank the remaining active projects and we will come back to the Council with 
some proposals 
then.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>Stéphane</div><div><br></div><div>The
 motion:</div><div><br></div><div><!--StartFragment--><p><b 
style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Motion on the implementation of the Fast Flux
recommendations that were adopted by the GNSO Council on 3 September 
2009<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Whereas the
Fast Flux PDP Working Group submitted its Final Report to the GNSO Council on
13 August 2009;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Whereas the
Fast Flux PDP Working Group did not make recommendations for new consensus
policy, or changes to existing policy, but did develop several other
recommendations that were adopted by the Council on 3 September 2009 (see 
</span><span lang="EN-US"><a 
href="http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-03sep09.htm";><span 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-03sep09.htm</span></a></span><span
 lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">);<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span 
lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Whereas the
GNSO Council intended to create a drafting team to </span><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Times 
New Roman&quot;">develop
a plan with a set of priorities and schedule to address the adopted
recommendations for review and consideration by the GNSO 
Council;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:
&quot;Times New Roman&quot;">Whereas due to workload and other priorities such 
a drafting
team was never created;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:
&quot;Times New Roman&quot;">Whereas the Council tasked the Council leadership 
at the
wrap up meeting at the ICANN meeting in Cartagena to put forward proposals to 
</span><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Arial">suggest which projects should be continued and discontinued</span><span 
lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:
&quot;Times New Roman&quot;">;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:
&quot;Times New Roman&quot;">Whereas the Council leadership has reviewed the 
Fast Flux
Recommendations that were adopted by the GNSO Council, also in light of the
recent recommendations made by the</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> Registration Abuse Policies Working 
Group;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Whereas the
Council leadership has recommended the approach outlined below to the GNSO
Council for consideration as an acceptable way of implementing the adopted
recommendations and therewith closing the 
project;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">RESOLVED,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p 
style="margin-left:18.0pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri">The Council accepts the approach identified below for the
adopted recommendations (see </span><span lang="EN-US"><a 
href="http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-03sep09.htm";><span 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-03sep09.htm</span></a></span><span
 lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">) and instructs the
ICANN Staff to implement these recommendations as set forth 
below:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l7 level1 lfo10;tab-stops:11.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">a)<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times 
New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
</span></span></span><u><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Adopted recommendation 
#1</span></u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">: To encourage ongoing discussions within the community regarding the
development of best practices and / or Internet industry solutions to identify
and mitigate the illicit uses of Fast Flux<o:p></o:p></span></p><p 
class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:90.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l8 level1 
lfo8;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;mso-fareast-font-family:
Symbol;mso-bidi-font-family:Symbol"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New 
Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><i 
style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Proposed implementation:
Integrate this recommendation into the Registration Abuse Policies WG
Recommendation on Malicious Use of Domain Names Recommendation #1 recommending 
the
creation of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries
address the illicit use of domain names. <o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p 
class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;tab-stops:11.0pt 36.0pt;
mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p
 class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt;text-indent:18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l7 level1 lfo10;tab-stops:11.0pt 36.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:
none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">b)<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
</span></span></span><u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">Adopted recommendation #2</span></u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">: The Registration
Abuse Policy Working Group (RAPWG) should examine whether existing policy may
empower Registries and Registrars, including consideration for adequate
indemnification, to mitigate illicit uses of Fast Flux;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p 
class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l8 level1 
lfo8;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;mso-fareast-font-family:
Symbol;mso-bidi-font-family:Symbol"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New 
Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span 
lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">Implementation completed as it was addressed
by<b> </b></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;
mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">the RAP WG in its final report (see <span 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></span><span lang="EN-US"><a 
href="http://gnso.icann.org/issues/rap/rap-wg-final-report-29may10-en.pdf";><span
 style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;
color:#0023F7;text-decoration:none;text-underline:none">http://gnso.icann.org/issues/rap/rap-wg-final-report-29may10-en.pdf</span></a></span><span
 lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="mso-pagination:none;tab-stops:11.0pt 36.0pt;
mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p
 class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l7 level1 lfo10;tab-stops:11.0pt 54.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:
none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">c)<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
</span></span></span><u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">Adopted recommendation #3</span></u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">: To encourage
interested stakeholders and subject matter experts to analyze the feasibility
of a Fast Flux Data Reporting System to collect data on the prevalence of
illicit use, as a tool to inform future discussions;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p 
class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l8 level1 
lfo8;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;mso-fareast-font-family:
Symbol;mso-bidi-font-family:Symbol"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New 
Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><i 
style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">Proposed
Implementation</span></i><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span 
lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">: ICANN staff is requested to organize a workshop at an ICANN meeting
in 2011 (e.g. Include it as a topic of the DNS Abuse Forum) to discuss this
issue in further detail with the ICANN Community. ICANN Staff is expected to
report back to the GNSO Council on the outcome of the workshop and any possible
follow up / next steps that result from such a 
meeting.<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="mso-pagination:none;tab-stops:11.0pt 36.0pt;
mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p
 class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l7 level1 lfo10;tab-stops:11.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">d)<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times 
New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
</span></span></span><u><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Adopted recommendation 
#4</span></u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">: To encourage staff to examine the role that ICANN can play as a
“best practices facilitator" within the community;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p 
class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l8 level1 
lfo8;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;mso-fareast-font-family:
Symbol;mso-bidi-font-family:Symbol"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New 
Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><i 
style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">Proposed
Implementation</span></i><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span 
lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">: Integrate this recommendation into the RAP WG Recommendation on “Meta
Issue: Collection and Dissemination of Best Practices” which recommends that
the “GNSO, and the larger ICANN community in general, create and support 
structured,
funded mechanisms for the collection and maintenance of best 
practices.”</span></i><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri"> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;
mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="margin-left:36.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l7 level1 lfo10;tab-stops:11.0pt 36.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:
none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">e)<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
</span></span></span><u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">Adopted recommendation #5</span></u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">: To consider the
inclusion of other stakeholders from both within and outside the ICANN
community for any future Fast Flux policy development 
efforts;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l8 level1 
lfo8;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;mso-fareast-font-family:
Symbol;mso-bidi-font-family:Symbol"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New 
Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><i 
style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">Proposed
Implementation</span></i><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span 
lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">: Ensure that any invitations for above proposed workshop and any other
activities that result from any of the activities related to the fast flux 
recommendations
are circulated as wide as possible.<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p 
class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;tab-stops:11.0pt 36.0pt;
mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p
 class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:none;
mso-list:l7 level1 lfo10;tab-stops:11.0pt 36.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">f)<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times 
New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
</span></span></span><u><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Adopted recommendation 
#6</span></u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">: To ensure that successor PDPs on this subject, if any, address the
charter definition issues identified in the Fast Flux Final 
Report.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l8 level1 
lfo8;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;mso-fareast-font-family:
Symbol;mso-bidi-font-family:Symbol"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New 
Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><i 
style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">Proposed
Implementation</span></i><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span 
lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">: No action needed at this point, but should be included if any future
PDPs are initiated on this subject.<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p 
class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;
mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p 
class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:none;
mso-list:l7 level1 lfo10;tab-stops:11.0pt 36.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">g)<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times 
New Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
</span></span></span><u><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Adopted recommendation 
#6</span></u><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:
Calibri">: To form a Drafting Team to work with support staff on developing a
plan with set of priorities and schedule that can be reviewed and considered by
the new Council as part of its work in developing the Council Policy Plan and
Priorities for 2010.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-pagination:
none;mso-list:l8 level1 lfo8;tab-stops:11.0pt 54.0pt;mso-layout-grid-align:
none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;mso-fareast-font-family:Symbol;
mso-bidi-font-family:Symbol"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span 
style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New 
Roman&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><i 
style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Proposed Implementation: 
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>The Council deems this work to be
completed in conjunction with the above-proposed implementation 
proposals.<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">RESOLVED
FURTHER<o:p></o:p></span></p><p style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri">The Council now considers the work of the Fast Flux WG
complete. As such, the "Fast Flux Council Follow-up" action item is
deemed closed and will be deleted from the Pending Project 
List.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p></div></body></html>

Attachment: Fast Flux Motion SVG.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: 
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><p class="MsoNormal"></p>

<!--EndFragment-->


</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>