ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Re: Meeting with the Board on Sunday in Cartagena

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Re: Meeting with the Board on Sunday in Cartagena
  • From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 02:12:49 +0900
  • Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=8/kMArbE+NIGbIFsidPQeOGEXPTKuQgqKFMywu9kPOg=; b=gjiyuKvIfaB15HuG4T6ZO9heuSSTtZi6e/FRshou8iB3/Zw70qDXbf+HrJkIaZ0M6d swWHeu5ffTU8sa8MB1Y+2xtBBldv3GJHcqKhpXuy7KsGuB0GIOtpcxb/38OIUm0RyItH J0i2PQ7FliSDkH2qZl1ahNArPZvp/dD9Z7ImM=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=E0TvienA6UeqJBZ0DhXgiveIkuRnSN9FVH9Gmo/ZsMZ6BlufNVQWJxbs70/ZDtjwXv 7nLdOP/kpWawZOTl+mHf4tDJhih8cXMSmHbmmFQ0MzDAeH6WDlfgnRXavNjQXLTSqbeS ps8EN+t1MXC/1QlNXngw13NWRq48R20qgGDKs=
  • In-reply-to: <099D6283-033C-4F2C-9F36-43EE013CDE51@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <325C7E5D-4829-41C3-8B89-71E42E546EC6@indom.com> <099D6283-033C-4F2C-9F36-43EE013CDE51@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Stephane,

some questions:

Here are the topics that I have made a note of as having been suggested so
> far:
>
> - A conversation that includes Rec. 6 and applicant support—substantive
> strengths and weaknesses of the groups' outputs to date, best ways to carry
> these initiatives forward.
>
> I guess that we are going to talk about the idea of cross-community working
groups or it is about the outcome of those groups?or both?


> - Next challenges of the new gtld process: vertical integration next steps,
> lowering barriers for special projects, outcomes of the outreach activities
> done so far.
>
>
for lower barriers for special projects, do you mean JAS works? because it
is first time to see mention of "special projects" which may have
restrictive meaning.

Rafik
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>