RE: AW: [council] MP3 recording GNSO Council teleconference, Thursday 28 October 2010

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why? This in relation to procedures for Council, not policy. If the OSC
doesn't like our changes will we accept that? I doubt it. To send it
back with the expectation that they rubber stamp it just wastes
everyone's time. Let's tweak it to be workable for a majority
(personally, I like the language on noncommercial and personal interests
but a majority may not), get it approved and move on.


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: AW: [council] MP3 recording  GNSO Council teleconference,
> Thursday   28 October 2010
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, November 19, 2010 6:04 am
> To: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > 
> > Sure, of course, it shouldn't be hard to fix, unless we manage to make it 
> > that way.  Has to go back through GCOT too, no?
> > 
> > BD
> 
> Depends on what we're trying to do. But I expect there would be changes that 
> would need to go back to through the OSC's team yes.
> 
> Stéphane