ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] COUNCIL RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO CCT FINAL CONSOLIDATED REPORT

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] COUNCIL RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO CCT FINAL CONSOLIDATED REPORT
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 23:00:29 -0300
  • Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bXvT3iqiXZKtlIHy/VCnW3E++rxJMVkaLHb0UcHJ0mE=; b=guNACQERKCmk1P0fRSH96B0jJTe+20Wue6PorbG95nFQF6uoSKBv1a1GUZKCZf2N42 Cc0BonzXEjlXnpW/84GxItn994oCQZtSOpi2mLMzkKQZKJV2vUx+5w1g8T5xhRSvTkLG 5dD105NuFF+1WvDeLjWP7Lez2hZxc8mIPjUmU=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Lu3O/npPJZJ3i932XOD40if8XgRzY6zi45MT08JSjytrSSGeExZRYfycQLUeESdQ8W j+5WhGitygeje1i1yQr/8uUd3xqdBI0l21GiYd3LBjIm04YHLW2EnxCeD9oU+jPCS5UY zEj+SMeD8ZJfa2WuxuHpQEfpLfgzUbkDlfq5E=
  • In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07033E1243@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07033E1243@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I second this motion
Olga

2010/6/2 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  I am hereby making the following motion in order to meet the 8-day
> advance requirement for our 10 June Council meeting.  Please note that on
> the OSC list the issue of whether the comments submitted in the public
> comment period (all 4 of them) might create a need to revise the CCT 
> recommendations
> in some way was raised, but the OSC did not reach any decision one way or
> the other in that regard.  After reviewing the comments myself, it did not
> appear to me that they would necessitate any changes, so I personally
> thought it best to go ahead and make the motion.  If the Council thinks
> differently or, if between now and 10 June, the OSC takes a position on
> that, we can deal with that.   But we will at least have the motion on the
> table so that we can take action if we are ready.
>
> Please make the members of your various groups aware of the motion as soon
> as possible.  Thanks to Julie Hedland for drafting the motion.
>
> Chuck
>
> *COUNCIL RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO CCT FINAL CONSOLIDATED REPORT*
>
> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 May 2010 meeting, accepted the
> deliverable of the Communications and Coordination Work Team (CCT) as its
> final set of recommendations;
>
> WHEREAS, a twenty-one (21) day Public Comment Forum <*
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-23apr10-en.htm*<http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-23apr10-en.htm>>
>  completed between 23 April 2010 and 16 May 2010 and a Staff Summary and
> Analysis 
> <*http://forum.icann.org/lists/cct-recommendations/msg00004.html*<http://forum.icann.org/lists/cct-recommendations/msg00004.html>>
>  has been prepared;
>
> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council agreed to take action on the CCT's
> recommendations as soon as possible after the end of the public comment
> period;
>
> NOW, BE IT THEREFORE:
>
> RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the Final Consolidated Report <*
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cct-consolidated-report-final-09apr10-en.pdf*<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cct-consolidated-report-final-09apr10-en.pdf>>
>  of the CCT, without further modification, and directs Staff to begin work
> on implementation.
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council accepts the CCT’s specific
> recommendation to convene a standing committee whose role will be to
> monitor, coordinate, and manage the continuing implementation of the various
> recommendations emanating from the chartered GNSO Improvements Work Teams;
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council appreciates the thoughtful feedback
> of those community members who contributed to the Public Comment Forum <*
> http://**forum.icann.org/lists/cct-recommendations/*>  and directs Staff
> to consider their suggestions and recommendations during the implementation
> phase;
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council hereby discharges the CCT and
> expresses its gratitude and appreciation for the team’s dedication,
> commitment, and thoughtful recommendations.
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>