ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Motion re VRSN RSEP request

My understanding at this point in time is that there is no second to
Mike's motion.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
        Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:33 PM
        To: GNSO Council 
        Subject: RE: [council] Motion re VRSN RSEP request
        
        
        Apologies. Too much multitasking.  I misread the motion and
withdraw my second.  I expect to come back with a proposed friendly
amendment.


________________________________

                From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
                Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:29 PM
                To: 'GNSO Council '
                Subject: [council] Motion re VRSN RSEP request
                
                

                The BC makes the following motion for Council
consideration in our next meeting, and would appreciate a 'second'.  In
sum, we request that the Council ask ICANN Staff to 'slow down' the
process of approving Versign's latest RSEP proposal and accept community
input on it.  Thanks.

                 

                 

                Whereas, Verisign has recently made a proposal for an
additional registry service called "domain exchange" for the .net TLD.
http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/verisign-dnex-05apr10-en.pdf


                 

                Whereas, it appears the proposal may permit resumption
of abusive "domain tasting" activities which have been curbed by the AGP
Limits policy, and therefore appropriate limitations on the proposed
registry service must be considered.

                 

                RESOLVED:

                 

                The Council requests that Staff make the preliminary
determination that this RSEP proposal requires further study and public
comment, because it could raise significant issues with security and
stability and/or competition. 

                 

                 

                 

                Mike Rodenbaugh

                RODENBAUGH LAW

                tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087

                http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>