RE: [council] FW: Proposal to form a Joint ALAC - GNSO WG "to develop a sustainable approach to providing support to applicants requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDs" in response to the ICANN Board Resolution 20 at the Nairobi Meeti

["Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Rafiq,

> That is why I would like if possible that Bruce point to documents (if
> they exist) explaining in details the why of such requested costs for
> running a regisrty from ICANN perspective?but also for the application
> fees as the explanation of cost recovery remains vague and abstract.
> 


There are two papers available on the ICANN component of the costs.

See:

http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/cost-considerations-23oct08-en.
pdf

and

http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/cost-considerations-04oct09-en.
pdf

There is also a paper on a benchmarking study on what is involved in
operating a registry.   This was conducted by KPMG and compared 7 gTLDs
and 6 ccTLDs across 10 countries.

See:
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/benchmarking-report-15feb10-en.
pdf

Note that there are also some letter of credit requirements etc to be
able to provide funding to operate a registry for I think three
additional years, if a registry operator chooses to cease providing that
function.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin