RE: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

That was unintentional. The reference to the WG chair is fine with me.

Tim  
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] Friendly amendments to VI motion
From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 6:34 am
To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi everyone
 
For some reason I didn't get Tim's email proposing further amendments to
the amended VI motion, so forgive me if I'm getting something wrong. I
just wanted to ask Tim if he could explain the request. As I read it as
forwarded to me, there seems a possibility that dropping the reference
to the WG Chair from the first sentence raises the possibility that a WG
member who is NOT the Chair could go directly to seek Council approval,
bypassing the Chair whose role it is to achieve consensus amongst the
WG.
 
Cheers
Mary 
 
 
 
 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584