ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Draft AoC Review Teams Proposal Summary


A very good summary, thanks for going to the trouble of writing it Chuck.

To me, the crucial element here is working out how we want to identify and 
submit volunteers. I don't see Council comments as being that important in this 
instance.

So I think it would be good to have a chance to start our discussion on the 
first topic on the list, in anticipation of our next Council meeting.

Stéphane

Le 30 déc. 2009 à 06:27, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :

> Attached is my personal summary of the ICANN Draft Proposal for AoC Review 
> Teams.  I welcome all to review it and correct any inaccuracies.
>  
> It appears to me that the Council has two possible action items regarding 
> this both of which are time sensitive:
>  
> 1. Decide whether we want to submit comments from the Council and, if so, 
> develop a plan for doing that in our 7 Jan meeting.  Note that comments are 
> due the end of January.
>  
> 2. Develop a plan for identifying volunteers to nominate for each of the four 
> review teams.  Because the Accountability & Transparency Review will start 
> early in 2010, we should start work on this right away.
>  
> Glen - Please add the following under AOB for our 7 Jan meeting:
>  
> 7.2.1 Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams
>  
> 7.2.1.1 Brief review of the proposal
>  
> 7.2.1.2 Should the Council submit comments on behalf of the GNSO?  If so, 
> develop plan.
>  
> 7.2.1.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as nominees for each of the 
> four review teams?  (Next steps?)
>  
> All - Please review the attached file and the two reference documents named 
> at the beginning of the document.
>  
> Chuck
> <AoC Review Teams  summary prepared by Chuck Gomes 29 Dec 09 for GNSO 
> Council.doc>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>