ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG

  • To: Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:56:53 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <080601ca5b97$6d5b26c0$48117440$@asia>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcpY+/CXPrYQaWmoTk2ZUWx3ePlCAAAMrQpAACPqE6AAFzLJGgBet89QAAEdKrs=
  • Thread-topic: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
  • User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605

Hi Edmon,

Thanks for that. To be honest, I think it may need an extra sentence of
context to ensure there are no misunderstandings. I¹m sure many people
probably think the fast-track is the PDP process. It may be worth explaining
that the fast-track is a way to get some IDN ccTLDs out there before the PDP
process is completed.

Stéphane


Le 02/11/09 09:35, « Edmon Chung » <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Hi Stéphane,
> 
> 
> The wording is chosen to mean when the ccpdp process and not the IDN ccTLD
> Fast Track process.
> Hope this clarifies the issue.
>  
> Edmon
>  
>  
>  
> 
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 7:13 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry; Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
>  
> Maybe I¹m not understanding the proposed change. Does adding ³Upon adoption of
> either the Recommendations from the ccNSO policy development process on the
> introduction and delegation of IDN ccTLDs² not mean that the JIG effectively
> closes on Nov 16, the date the IDN ccTLD fast-track starts?
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> Le 31/10/09 01:09, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Glen,
> 
> Let's make sure this is on our agenda for 23 Nov.  In the meantime, in my
> opinion, the change looks pretty benign to me.  Does anyone think differently?
> 
> Chuck
> 
>  
> 
> 
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Glen de Saint  Géry
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:01 AM
> To: Council  GNSO
> Subject: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG  WG
> 
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Forwarded  From: Bart Boswinkel
> 
> 
> Hi  Glen,
> Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward  it to
> the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well?
> The change  is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either adoption
> of IDN  ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD application Guidebook.
> Kind  regards,
> Bart 
>  
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>