Re: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG
Maybe I¹m not understanding the proposed change. Does adding ³Upon adoption of either the Recommendations from the ccNSO policy development process on the introduction and delegation of IDN ccTLDs² not mean that the JIG effectively closes on Nov 16, the date the IDN ccTLD fast-track starts? Stéphane Le 31/10/09 01:09, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > Glen, > > Let's make sure this is on our agenda for 23 Nov. In the meantime, in my > opinion, the change looks pretty benign to me. Does anyone think differently? > > Chuck > >> >> >> >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry >> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:01 AM >> To: Council GNSO >> Subject: [council] FW: Proposal for updated charter of the JIG WG >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Forwarded From: Bart Boswinkel >> >> >> Hi Glen, >> Included the proposed updated charter for the JIG WG. Could you forward it >> to the GNSO Council and request to adopt the charter as well? >> The change is last paragraph. Proposed closing date is now either adoption >> of IDN ccPDP recommendations or adoption of new gTLD application Guidebook. >> Kind regards, >> Bart > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|