<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Motion for using a secret ballot for the chair election on 28 Oct.
- To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Motion for using a secret ballot for the chair election on 28 Oct.
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:27:05 -0400
- In-reply-to: <28F3C2DD-5A17-4A6E-AB26-EA5E4DB86DF6@acm.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcpSjJrYIQw+6UvZSFyOnnbTUkOZygAAAxAA
- Thread-topic: [council] Motion for using a secret ballot for the chair election on 28 Oct.
Thanks for clarifying.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 4:23 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Motion for using a secret ballot for the chair
election on 28 Oct.
On 21 Oct 2009, at 16:16, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> Thanks for the information, Avri. Just so I'm clear: Did anyone
> suggest that such a "gag rule" should/would/could be imposed?
> Thanks!
No suggestions, only vague fears that someone else could/would suggest.
Plus there was the conversation on the list that sort of begged the
question, So for completeness sake, i asked the question.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|