GNSO Email Archives: [council]

ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] NCA Assignments

To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] NCA Assignments
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:40:05 -0400
In-reply-to: <040877AF82B7448E933265B66B8FB85F@PSEVO>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <780A738C62DA734987AC5BD2A90961D197F71D@cbiexm01dc.cov.com> <02973457-8CF5-4FF1-A83F-317111558A37@psg.com> <D8C08643-F3CF-463D-A92A-E2D01BAE1A39@psg.com> <040877AF82B7448E933265B66B8FB85F@PSEVO>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcpH9qdtTM+cHQU8RQiYTGgjYrNgjgAAIaPwAAdLOlA=
Thread-topic: [council] NCA Assignments

I don't think it should be ignored but we would have to change our
previously approved plan to not ignore it.  I support doing that.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:12 AM
> To: 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: RE: [council] NCA Assignments
> 
> 
> Avri,
> 
> I believe a preference has been expressed for Terry and the NCP House.
> Why is this being ignored ?
> Philip
> 
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [council] NCA Assignments
  - From: Avri Doria

References:
- [council] NCA Assignments
  - From: Rosette, Kristina
- Re: [council] NCA Assignments
  - From: Avri Doria
- Re: [council] NCA Assignments
  - From: Avri Doria
- RE: [council] NCA Assignments
  - From: Philip Sheppard

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>