ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: [gnso-osc] RE: Further Council Ops Procedures Thoughts

  • To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: [gnso-osc] RE: Further Council Ops Procedures Thoughts
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:49:08 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <25B93536E5DA4BEB8D0673D8889ABF8E@PSEVO>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702D3FA5C@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <A020F2BB31444D29A1414105EADFC7F8@secondgen.local> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702D3FABC@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <25B93536E5DA4BEB8D0673D8889ABF8E@PSEVO>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Aco7bobroxomuNz7S8mvrQaOclOF9wAHFqvZAAJ+29AAAL4/HwAAL/JwAACai+AAALIWdwACac4mAAIyyqAACVafawAhecJgAACpAvAAB+KykAAa6B6gAAr8JFA=
  • Thread-topic: [gnso-osc] RE: Further Council Ops Procedures Thoughts
Philip,

For our purposes, four options might be an idea worth considering in the
future but I don't think we need to deal with that now.  

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:36 AM
> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx; 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] RE: Further Council Ops Procedures Thoughts
> 
> 
> Chuck wrote: Abstaining is not the same as not voting in my opinion.
> David Mayer wrote: There is a real difference between 
> abstaining and not voting.
> 
> Would either of you like to explain it ?
> If you are correct are we in the new rules giving Council 
> members present at a meeting four options:
> yes
> no
> abstain
> not voting
> 
> Philip
> 
> 
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>