<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:33:11 +0100
- In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07027CCB3B@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AclgTIvUczTaB8CBRNqoTQVagVsgbAAOiGwh
- Thread-topic: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409
Chuck,
Is this the motion for which I had offered a friendly amendment?
I don¹t recognize the text we had agreed upon, but I may be wrong...
Stéphane
Le 17/12/08 14:37, « Gomes, Chuck » <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Avri,
>
> I just realized that the attached motion regarding the 4-month communication
> period that I submitted on 21 November has been left off the agenda for our
> Council meeting tomorrow.
>
> Chuck
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|