ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Absentee voting closed on motion on the Amendment to the Council Resolution on the IRTP Denial Definitions PDP

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Absentee voting closed on motion on the Amendment to the Council Resolution on the IRTP Denial Definitions PDP
  • From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:18:08 -0700
  • Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AckwhLTH8GML3UTaQv6o0s5TWw4Ysg==
  • Thread-topic: Absentee voting closed on motion on the Amendment to the Council Resolution on the IRTP Denial Definitions PDP

Dear Councilors,

Absentee voting is closed on the motion amending the Council Resolution on the 
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Denial Definitions Policy Development 
Process (PDP) as stated below.

 The motion passed and the results are:
21 Votes in favour:

Philip Sheppard, Zahid Jamil, Ute Decker, Kristina Rosette, Tony Holmes, Greg 
Ruth, Robin Gross, Carlos Souza, Avri Doria, Olga Cavalli (one vote each) 
Adrian Kinderis, Tim Ruiz, Chuck Gomes, Edmon Chung (two votes each)

Absentee votes in favour were registered from Mike Rodenbaugh (one vote) and 
Jordi Iparraguirre (two votes)

Motion 1

Motion on the Amendment to the Council Resolution on the Inter-Registrar 
Transfer Policy (IRTP) Denial Definitions Policy Development Process (PDP)

Moved: Chuck Gomes
Seconded: Avri Doria

Whereas:

*       On 4 September 2008, the GNSO Council adopted a Recommendation 
concluding a Policy Development Process (PDP) to clarify four of the nine 
transfer denial reasons enumerated in the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy;

*       The ensuing public comment period rendered a comment identifying a 
possibility to misinterpret a part of the proposed text for Denial Reason #9, 
notably the words "or transfer to the Registrar of Record";

*       The GNSO Council, in consultation with members of the drafting group 
for this PDP, has found it appropriate to delete these words from the proposed 
text for Denial Reason #9;


Resolved:

That Denial reason #9 in which the current text reads:

A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be determined) after 
being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the original Registrar 
in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a decision in the dispute 
resolution process so directs).

Be amended to read:

A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be determined) after 
being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the original Registrar 
in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a decision in the dispute 
resolution process so directs). "Transferred" shall only mean that an 
inter-registrar transfer has occurred in accordance with the procedures of this 
policy.




Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>