Re: [council] Making Council less crazy

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,


On 30 Sep 2008, at 14:06, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

> I would just like to clarify that ICANN Staff's opinion of what is  
> in scope
> of GNSO PDP is required by bylaws and certainly can be useful.  But  
> it is
> not necessarily the final word.  GNSO's opinion ought to be of equal  
> weight,
Currently the by-laws allow for either possibility, putting different  
voting thresholds on the initiation of the PDP in the different cases:
> 33% is adequate when the staff says it is within scope and a  
supermajority is required when they say it isn't.  The problem gets  
more difficult when the determine of the Staff is partial, split or  
equivocal.
> at least, but ultimately only the Board could make a decision if  
> there was
> disagreement between Staff and GNSO.
As I understand it the Board can order a PDP anytime it wants, whether  
in scope or not.

a.