Re: [council] GNSO Council Comments in IDNC WG Final Report

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

Again thanks to Edmon for getting the report in time for this meeting  
- especially as we need to submit our response before the 15 Aug  
deadline.
As there has not been any discussion on the list about this response  
yet, I wanted to make sure people had seen this item.

On 31 Jul 2008, at 12:49, Edmon Chung wrote:

> Then finally we also added a paragraph to revise one of the points  
> in our
> previous statement in response to strong objection by the Indian  
> delegate
> during our meeting with the GAC in Paris.  The paragraph was  
> specifically
> tagged for council review because it is a revision of a statement we  
> had put
> out earlier and the particular point was discussed at length.
>
> Anyway, for your quick reference, the suggested revised statement is  
> as
> follows:
>
> > There should be only one IDN ccTLD string per ISO 3166-1 entry per  
> > relevant
> > script per relevant language.

I will be proposing that we agree to send this response in by the  
deadline of 15 August.  So if you believe there are any edits  
necessary, please send them to the list for discussion as soon as  
possible.  Except for this one item, the rest of the response is  
believed to be in keeping with the previous responses and positions  
taken over the last months.
Thanks.

a.