ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting Group on Clarification of Reasons for Denial

  • To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting Group on Clarification of Reasons for Denial
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:54:16 -0400
  • Cc: <gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>, "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <20080606073441.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.5211bb6144.wbe@email.secureserver.net>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcjH4nagK2JLZWZvR0SyRD4Miw+S0gAAni6w
  • Thread-topic: [council] RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting Group on Clarification of Reasons for Denial

Thanks Tim.  That is consistent with what I thought and what Olof
confirmed and is information that I think is helpful for us as a Council
to know.  It appears to me that this could be an easy action item for
the Council in Paris.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:35 AM
        To: Gomes, Chuck
        Cc: gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx; Olof Nordling;
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [council] RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting
Group on Clarification of Reasons for Denial
        
        
        Chuck,
         
        We probably should have included that in the report. Others can
correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe in the end we all were in
agreement on the recommendations. 
         
        Note that although Paul S., Ross, and Taryn are listed as RrC
participants I do not recall them having been on the calls or voicing
support one way or the other. Paul D. and I did reach out to the RrC as
best we could for any concerns, but several RrC members were involved in
the previous work that had been done on the subject and registrar views
were very well known by Paul and myself and the other RrC members who
participated on the drafting team.
         
         
        Tim 
        
        

                -------- Original Message --------
                Subject: [council] RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from
Drafting Group on
                Clarification of Reasons for Denial
                From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
                Date: Thu, June 05, 2008 9:48 am
                To: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>,
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                Cc: <gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
                
                
                Thank you very much Olof.  What was the level of support
in the small group for the recommendations?
                 
                Chuck


________________________________

                        From: owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [
<mailto:owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
mailto:owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
                        Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:13 AM
                        To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                        Cc: gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
                        Subject: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting
Group on Clarification of Reasons for Denial
                        
                        
                        Dear Councilors,
                        On behalf of the Chair, Mike O'Connor, and the
whole Drafting Group, please find attached the Final Draft from the
Group, for your consideration and decisions on how to proceed. The Final
Draft is also available on the Drafting Group's Wiki, at
<https://st.icann.org/irt-pdp/index.cgi?final_draft>
https://st.icann.org/irt-pdp/index.cgi?final_draft .
                        Very best regards
                        Olof



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>