<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Domain Tasting - Follow up on possibility of fee application through interim or special budget process
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Domain Tasting - Follow up on possibility of fee application through interim or special budget process
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:21:08 -0500
- In-reply-to: <3BA081BEFB35144DBD44B2F141C2C727047AAB5B@cbiexm04dc.cov.co m>
- List-id: council@gnso.icann.org
- References: <3BA081BEFB35144DBD44B2F141C2C727047AAB5B@cbiexm04dc.cov.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
My understanding of what Denise said was that ICANN is proposing to
levy the per-domain fee as part of the standard budget cycle which
would put it in place starting July 2008. I heard nothing today about
any interim measures.
Alan
At 17/01/2008 10:55 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
All,
Our discussion today of application of the ICANN fee to names
deleted during AGP focused on the regular ICANN budget cycle. I had
understood from our 31 October meeting that it may be possible to
pursue levying the fee through an interim or special budgeting
process, and that we would receive from staff further information
about that possibility and a potential timetable.
I don't recall receiving any further information. Did we receive
it? If so, would someone please point it out for me? If we didn't,
I believe it would be helpful to have before Delhi. To the extent
it can be provided quickly, it would be especially helpful for the
design team to have before Delhi.
Thanks.
Kristina
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|