<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform
- To: "Gomes,Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:49:00 -0700
- Cc: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.12.5
<html><body><div>Hi Chuck. I appreciate your points regarding the WG and
potential for flexibility. But I agree more with what Philip has written in the
document. I am not yet convinced that such flexibility is possible to the
extent that we can rely only on WGs. I think it should continue to be explored,
but I believe its too early to completely dump the Task Force option. We need
more experience, trial and error, etc. with WGs.</div>
<div><BR><BR>Tim Ruiz<BR>Vice President<BR>Corp. Development &
Policy<BR>The Go Daddy Group, Inc.<BR>Direct: 319-329-9804<BR>Fax:
480-247-4516<BR><A href="mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx";>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><BR>How
am I doing? Please contact my direct supervisor at <A
href="mailto:president@xxxxxxxxxxx";>president@xxxxxxxxxxx</A> with any
feedback.<BR><BR>This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for
use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential
information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this
message and its attachments.<BR><BR><BR></div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px
solid" webmail="1">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE: [council]
Draft reply Council on GNSO reform<BR>From: "Gomes, Chuck"
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Wed, November 21, 2007 1:18 pm<BR>To:
"Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "Council
GNSO"<BR><council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><BR>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=464321619-21112007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Thank you very much Philip for the very quick turn-around
on this and for a job very well done. I inserted my comments in the
attached document.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>Chuck Gomes</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Tahoma size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>"This message is intended for the use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT:
#0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Philip
Sheppard<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:04 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
'Council GNSO'<BR><B>Subject:</B> [council] Draft reply Council on GNSO
reform<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>As agreed on
yesterday's Council call, I promised to draft a short paper as a "straw man"
listing those recommendations on GNSO reform that may be supportable by Council
as a whole.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>Given the deadline
is submission by 30 November I thought I'd better get a move
on.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=671574813-21112007></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>Not surprisingly
those listed are ones seeking:</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>- improvements in
policy development and timeline flexibility,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>- improvements in
communications,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>- improvements in
outreach</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>- greater support
for constituencies.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=671574813-21112007></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>I have left out
proposals on structural change suspecting we will have differing
views.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=671574813-21112007></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>On working groups,
I am proposing a partial support, suspecting we mostly feel they will work for
much policy work, but that tying our hands to have ONLY working groups for
EVERY issue before us would be too inflexible. </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=671574813-21112007></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>I hope I have
captured areas of potential agreement. Your first comments please by
<STRONG>November 25</STRONG> after which time I'll edit a proposed final
version.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=671574813-21112007>Comments can be as
simple as - "yes I/we support" or can be proposals to strike one of the
proposed areas of agreement. In that case, a word of explanation would be good
to share.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=671574813-21112007></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=671574813-21112007></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Philip
</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|