Re: [council] Point for Discussion (proxy voting)

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I am not sure if we will have time, but can put it under any other  
business and if everything goes quickly on contractual conditions and  
Whois, then we may get to it.  Otherwise I can carry over to the next  
meeting.  If there is no real discussion, it should be possible to  
get it done at this meeting.

a.

On 2 aug 2007, at 11.30, Philip Sheppard wrote:

> Do we have time for this on the 9 aug agenda ?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner- 
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip
> Sheppard
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 10:06 AM
> To: 'GNSO Council'
> Subject: RE: [council] Point for Discussion (proxy voting)
>
> I support Ross here.
> The simplest method of proxy voting will be best.
> Responsibility should lie with the Council member only to vote.
> If they are remiss, so be it.
> And of course if we introduce proxy votes then it would apply to  
> all Council members.
>
> I propose a simple resolution at our next meeting:
>
> "The Council would like to introduce a system of proxy voting.
> Council requests the ICANN General Counsel to confirm EITHER that  
> this is possible under the
> current by-laws and if not advise what by-law change would be  
> needed to enable it"
>
> Philip