RE: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks much Liz.  Is the first presentation an official position of the
ccNSO or of the ccNSO GAC/IDN working group?

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liz Williams [mailto:liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:02 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Mike Rodenbaugh; GNSO Council
> Subject: Re: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
> 
> Hello everyone
> 
> You may find this information helpful from the ccNSO meeting 
> in Lisbon.
> 
> http://www.icann.org/meetings/lisbon/presentation-ccnso-idn-28
> mar07.pdf
> 
> Here is the presentation by  Elisabeth Portenueve --  http:// 
> www.icann.org/meetings/lisbon/presentation-ccnso-gac-idns-26mar07.pdf
> 
> Here is the other presentation by Debbie Garside -- http:// 
> www.icann.org/meetings/lisbon/presentation-garside-26mar07.pdf
> 
> Happy Easter.
> 
> Liz
> 
> 
> .....................................................
> 
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 05 Apr 2007, at 21:21, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > Elisabeth Portenueve is now working for the ISO Maintenance 
> Agency and 
> > might be a useful resource in this regard.
> >
> > Chuck Gomes
> >
> > "This message is intended for the use of the individual or 
> entity to 
> > which it is addressed, and may contain information that is 
> privileged, 
> > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any 
> > unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly 
> prohibited. 
> > If you have received this message in error, please notify sender 
> > immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 3:07 PM
> >> To: GNSO Council
> >> Subject: RE: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
> >>
> >> Thanks Bruce, so can we ask both the GAC and the ISO Maintenance 
> >> Agency?
> >>
> >>
> >> Also would love to see that research if you have or can recall any 
> >> other identifying info so I can find?
> >>
> >> Mike Rodenbaugh
> >> Sr. Legal Director
> >> Yahoo! Inc.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 6:43 PM
> >> To: GNSO Council
> >> Subject: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
> >>
> >> Hello Mike,
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Furthermore, we note close similarity among many
> >> longstanding ccTLDs
> >>> (such as .ai/.al, .am/.an, .bi/.bj, .ch/.cn, .gg/.gq,
> >> .ni/.nl, .to/.tp
> >>> and others).  Is the GAC aware of any confusion amongst
> >> users of these
> >>> ccTLDs?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Actually this could be a good question to ask about the ISO list in
> >> general.   Ie did the ISO consider the potential for confusion when
> >> selecting the two letter codes?
> >>
> >> Actually I have read some research to indicate that humans 
> are better 
> >> able to distinguish differences in short strings rather than long 
> >> strings.
> >>
> >> E.g humans can spot the difference between "to" and "tom"
> >> relatively easily, but not necessarily between "licence" and 
> >> "license" .
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Bruce Tonkin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
>