Re: [council] Reminder regarding summaries of discussions during the dinner with the ICANN Board

["Sophia B" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

I recall offering to submit our tables recommendation after dinner, and no
one showed interest or asked me to submit via email as well.  So I tore the
paper in front of you folks.  The requirement for the need of this should
have been requested before or while there, or when I asked. Please advise
the contacts on my table, so that I can reconstruct the recommendations, as
they were long.

Sophie


On 04/12/06, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a reminder to submit your summaries of the discussions during the
> dinner with the ICANN Board to Glen so that she can send a summary.
>
> Chuck Gomes kindly sent the following summary of the discussion on his
> table:
>
> Here is a list of the discussion points that occurred at our table in
> the Board/Council dinner meeting last night.
>
> 1. Difficulty in dealing with registrations of Punycode-like ASCII
> registrations such as xn--verisign.com.
> 2. GAC does not want to have an operational role in the intro of new
> gTLDs.
> 3. Idea of a global UDRP like process to deal with string issues
> relating to public policy issues.
> 4. ICANN should proactively notify GAC about proposed strings as soon as
> the application process ends.
> 5. ICANN should also attempt to notify governments that are not active
> in the GAC.
> 6. The GAC should only be one communication channel regarding proposed
> new gTLD strings.
> 7. The UDRP like process could be fit well with concerns about national
> sovereignity.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin