Re: [council] Motions passed by the GNSO Council on May 18, 2006

["Sophia B" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Glen,

It may be a minor correction, but Motion 3 was seconded by me and not Avri.
Thanks you.
Sophia


On 19/05/06, GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [To: council[at]gnso.icann.org]
>
> Dear All,
>
> Ahead of the GNSO Council minutes, Council passed the following motions
> at its meeting on May 18, 2006.
>
> Motion 1:
>
> "The GNSO Council appoints Jordyn Buchanan as a non-voting outside
> adviser to the WHOIS Task force under Annex A, Section 5(a) of the ICANN
> bylaws. Jordyn is able to participate fully as a member of the task
> force and is able to act in the role of chair if so elected by the task
> force."
>
> Council voted unanimously to accept the motion.
>
> Motion 2:
>
> "The GNSO Council appoints Avri Doria as a voting outside adviser to the
> WHOIS task force under Annex A, Section 5(a) of the ICANN bylaws. Avri
> is able to participate fully as a member of the task force and is able
> to act in the role of chair if so elected by the task force.
>
> Council voted to accept the motion. One abstention from Avri Doria.
>
>
> Bruce Tonkin recommended that the GNSO form its own internal working
> group to determine the GNSO view of the IDN issues report, and then have
> three representatives from the GNSO working group meet with the three
> representatives from the ccNSO to coordinate a shared vision of the
> priority issues to address and identify the next steps (e.g whether to
> work on a single PDP, or conduct the work as two separate PDPs).
> The GNSO working group would report back to the GNSO Council for
> approving any recommendation for a PDP process.
>
> The timeline of the process would be for the internal GNSO working group
> to meet in June 2006 to discuss the issues report, and then arrange a
> meeting with the three ccNSO reps in Marrakech with the objective of
> having recommendations for the GNSO and ccNSO Councils in July 2006.
> Once the recommendations are made to the Councils, the working group
> would be disbanded.
>
> Motion 3:
>
> Bruce Tonkin, seconded by Avri Doria, proposed a motion:
> That the GNSO Council forms a GNSO working group of volunteers,
> conversant with the IDN issues raised in the IDN issues report.
>
> The purpose of the working group would be to:
>
> (1) review the Issues Report,
>
> (2) prioritise the policy issues in the Issues Report for further work,
>
> (3) develop the terms of reference for an initial policy development
> process in the area of IDNs within the GNSO,
>
> (4) propose ways of interacting with ICANN groups such as the
> President's Advisory Committee on IDNs, the GAC, ALAC, SSAC and other
> related groups in ICANN, and
>
> (5) select three representatives to interact with the three ccNSO
> representatives to form a separate joint GNSO/ccNSO working group to:
>
>   (5.1)  agree on the priority issues and determine whether to examine
> the issues as a single "joint" PDP, or as two separate PDPs
>
>   (5.2) provide a report to the GNSO and ccNSO Councils with
> recommendations for terms of reference of one or more PDPs, and the
> mechanisms for coordination with other parts of ICANN
>
> The group would aim to have recommendations completed by the end of July
> 2006.
>
> The motion passed unanimously by voice vote.
>
> Kind regards,
> Glen
>
> --
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org