ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Proposed approach to travel funding in the ICANN operating plan

  • To: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Proposed approach to travel funding in the ICANN operating plan
  • From: "Sophia B" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:56:28 +0200
  • Cc: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kurt Pritz" <kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx>, "Liz Williams" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CNuJAYgx1RnYJxL08HmbuChLDp4Ei1v/AftHrJld6CmDWG+vHJuyW8tpdOIGfftQkSy4rAQGQaoQqgfu5oT/1p3vBCYNiZKExEzsN8kAJGeTWWyZziMgpMpgcwG1lkmpAG2CTqHC8PULYz3XVUntDZAhVEEgMzmz3a6RRv4uUOA=
  • In-reply-to: <BAY105-DAV7F7CB89B6D62CD2F2DADDD3CD0@phx.gbl>
  • References: <fdcd4ef30604111225q6cf31353o6251c8fe3beb6e4f@mail.gmail.com> <BAY105-DAV7F7CB89B6D62CD2F2DADDD3CD0@phx.gbl>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks Marilyn, you have clarified your intent.

I was not sure of the ICANN FTF meeting you mentioned were for the
international one we go to, as such the budget needs to consider that.  I am
sure it varies from location to location for both local/international and
putting a fixed estimate may not be the best way, hence, you said Liz is
working on it.

Sophie


On 11/04/06, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Thanks, very helpful.
>
>  I hope my explanation about the two different kinds of meetings made
> sense.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Sophia B
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2006 3:25 PM
>
> *To:* Marilyn Cade
> *Cc:* Philip Sheppard; Bruce Tonkin; GNSO Council; Kurt Pritz; Liz
> Williams; Olof Nordling
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Proposed approach to travel funding in the ICANN
> operating plan
>
>
>
> Marilyn,
>
>
>
> I just want to make sure that while I support all 'Constituency
> Councilors' should be accommodated for the travel expense issue that Bruce
> proposed, I also want to voice that the policy we are supporting
> to accommodate the 'Constituency Councilors' does not override/disadvantage
> the policy that already exist for the NomComm appointees.
>
>
>
> I think it is a fair play to accommodate both in their respective
> positions.
>
>
>
> regards,
>
> Sophia
>
>
>
> On 11/04/06, *Marilyn Cade* <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Sophia, for asking what I meant.
>
> I was thinking of the "short policy meetings" as like the D.C. meeting and
> the upcoming European meeting, where the meeting is 2-3 days, versus a 5-7
> day ICANN face to face meeting which takes place 3 X a year.
>
> However, Liz has done more work already, I think on this topic, so my
> 'back of the envelop" ideas of estimates, may not be needed.
>
>   Marilyn
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Sophia B
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:35 PM
> *To:* Marilyn Cade
> *Cc:* Philip Sheppard; Bruce Tonkin; GNSO Council; Kurt Pritz; Liz
> Williams; Olof Nordling
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Proposed approach to travel funding in the ICANN
> operating plan
>
>
>
> Marilyn,
>
>
>
> Could you please describe what you mean by:
>
> 1- Short policy meetings.  What is included, air ticket, hotel & meal,
> number of days etc..
>
> 2- Week long ICANN meeting FTF, the same.
>
>
> Note: I am hoping your budget estimates for the travel cost of an
> international ticket /trip is different from local. If not please advise.
>
>
> Additionally, it is in any corporate travel policy, not sure have to ck
> labor law, that anything over 6hrs s/b business class.  This should also be
> consistent with current ICAAN travel policy.  Considering that we are not
> paid, I assumed the existing travel policy of ICANN is fair/consistant with
> that of most organization that actually are on paid travel.
>
> regards,
>
> Sophia
>
>
> On 11/04/06, *Marilyn Cade* < marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear all, I believe that we need to give Kurt a rather firm estimate of
> costs for travel for Councilors asap. If we 'ballpark' an estimate of
> $3,000
> USD for short policy meetings, and $5,000 for the week long ICANN face to
> face meetings, will that provide a firm enough estimate? I would also
> propose that perhaps we plan to budget two policy development meetings
> face
> to face, outside of the three ICANN meetings.
>
> I am happy to work with Glen on a straw proposal for the budget  if we can
> get a general agreement for a "template" approach.  Perhaps Ken would also
> be willing, as part of the Adm. Planning group to work on this?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:51 AM
> To: 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'GNSO Council'
> Cc: 'Kurt Pritz'; 'Liz Williams'; 'Olof Nordling'
> Subject: RE: [council] Proposed approach to travel funding in the ICANN
> operating plan
>
> Bruce, I fully endorse this proposal.
> Its a significant step forward for a more professional organisation.
>
> Philip
>
>
>
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>